Printable View
This individual is so vile-
https://rockymountainvoice.com/2025/...or-voter-data/Quote:
?The DOJ can take a hike?: Jena Griswold rejects federal demand for voter data
What ya got to hide there Jena?
Doe this explain why y’all are so fervently trying to keep Tina Peters away from Federal custody?
Goddamn right it is.
W/R/T your Tina comment,
Tina was convicted by a conservative jury in a conservative county. While her sentence was slightly longer than I would've expected, she was absolutely guilty, and those who live over here know her history.
She's a grifter, a con, did a bunch of fund sucking from area churches, did a bunch of Karen crap including kicking officers while screaming abuse, destroyed evidence, and the like.
Fuck. That. Bitch.
Please explain why Tina should be released by DJT for a completely appropriate State conviction.
I'll ETA: The length of her sentence etc. is subject to a State appeal and she may ultimately get traction there in a more appropriate sentence (2-3 years?) That is also, in no fashion, a fucking federal issue or DJT's business.
MAGA may as well be commies at this point for all the difference it makes in how much they want to shit on the Constitution to appease their celebrity hero.
WRT the voter data, yeah, they should probably release it.
Sorry your girl lostQuote:
Originally Posted by FoxtArt
Dude:Quote:
Originally Posted by BPTactical
He's got TDS, give him a break.
Let him blame everything on Trump and ignore the obvious problem here.
Jena knows those records would show huge numbers on NON-US voters on the rolls.
Let me get this right, you guys think the President of the US should be able to intervene in state convictions anytime they please?Quote:
Originally Posted by Oscar77
Of course not. You wouldn't want Biden releasing people convicted in county courts based on the political platform of immigration status or some other bullshit.
It's only because Trump wants it, then its OK.
If your political position shifts depending on who is in power, you're not a conservative, you are the problem.
If you want to alter the separation between State and Fed anytime it suits your convenience, then you intend to violate the constitutional construction of our republic just as much as the neo-pansy socialist with pink hair. You're just patting yourself on the back a whole lot more while doing it.
Everything public should be audited, with an option for 3rd party audits as well. Politicians? finances, elections, political slush funds for sex harassment settlements / sex abuse settlements, etc.
The public should have the option to police their public representatives.
Also, legalizing tar and feathering of politicians would put the fear of the public back into politicians minds and their choices to sell us out for personal gain.
Throw in some tort reform to reign in parasitic lawyers that inflate costs for everyone.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk