Symbol Of Hate

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Scanker19

Charge them with what? Vandalism?

---

Exactly. Tampering, maybe, depending on if anything was damaged. The First Amend covers a pretty wide range of disgusting speech.

I realize many of you have a sense of humor and some of you don't.
We've been thru this (sortta) before:

https://kdvr.com/news/local/man-cite...orado-capitol/

Neo Nazis typically take great pride in their swastikas.

That was thin, sloppy, asymmetrical... but at least it wasn't on its corner or backwards so it probably wasn't Leftists (who make the majority of swastikas nowadays, then screech they were "targeted").

I bet it was a couple of 16 year old boys being "edgy."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FoxtArt

Littering is an easy one if it's public land. While there's all sorts of new charges in the books now, and I'm decidedly against the anti-semites; it's just a symbol. I also agree it's likely not that organized, and that doesn't look like it's all that much effort. Potentially young pranksters, definately someone attention seeking.

I'm much more a constitutionalist than I am a person that needs to squish everybody I disagree with. It shouldn't be there, as it's certain they didn't have permission to put it there. It needs removed. Someone also can't put up a massive ad that is unregulated.

But if some Neo wants to paint a massive symbol on the side of his house, well, it's a free country.
I'm not going to stand in the way of the people they piss off, either, actions have consequences. I just don't want to be like Germany (all such symbols banned) or Britan (don't hurt feelings).

---

We do agree on some things....

Sent from my SM-F766U using Tapatalk