Close
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 52

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    I am my own action figure
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Wheat Ridge
    Posts
    4,010
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Looks promising.
    Good Shooting, MarkCO

    www.CarbonArms.us
    www.crci.org

  2. #2
    Plainsman
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    colorado springs
    Posts
    3,438

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KellyTTE View Post
    I spent a LONG time talking to the RevMed guys and posted about them during SHOT. It was founded by an active duty Special Forces Medic (18D) and they are genuinely passionate about their work.

    Their hemostatic products are just one of 4+ items their bringing out.

    Their tourniquets are also badass and deploy faster than the CAT or SOF tqs. If you fb you can follow them at:

    https://www.facebook.com/activmed

    Galaxy Note II + Tapatalk 2
    Sucks that they dont have a normal webpage

  3. #3
    .
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Florissant
    Posts
    4,380

    Default

    A Recee once told me they used tampons for bullet wounds. Perfect size, built in applicator, sterile, cheap, easy to carry, designed to expand and absorb blood. Makes sense to me.

  4. #4
    Door Kicker Mick-Boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Fremont County
    Posts
    1,568

    Default

    That's straight out of 70s. There are better options out there for hemorrhage control.
    Mick-Boy

    "Men who carry rifles for a living do not seek reward outside the guild. The most cherished gift...is a nod from his peers."


    nsrconsulting.net

  5. #5
    Door Kicker Mick-Boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Fremont County
    Posts
    1,568

    Default

    http://www.rxlist.com/script/main/ar...iclekey=177751

    Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration allowed marketing of an expandable, multi-sponge wound dressing to control the bleeding from certain types of wounds received in battle. For military use only, the XSTAT is a temporary dressing for wounds in areas that a tourniquet cannot be placed, such as the groin or armpit. The dressing can be used up to four hours, which could allow time for the patient to receive surgical care.

    According to the U.S. Army Medical Department, Medical Research and Materiel Command, since mid-World War II, nearly 50 percent of combat deaths have been due to exsanguinating hemorrhage (bleeding out). Of those, half could likely have been saved if timely, appropriate care had been available.

    The device consists of three, syringe-style applicators containing 92 compressed, cellulose sponges that have an absorbent coating. The sponges expand and swell to fill the wound cavity, after approximately 20 seconds upon contact with water from blood or bodily fluid. This creates a temporary physical barrier to blood flow. The number of sponges needed for effective hemorrhage control will vary depending on the size and depth of the wound. Up to three applicators may be used on a patient. The tablet-shaped sponges are each 9.8 millimeters in diameter and 4 to 5 millimeters in height. They can absorb 3 milliliters of blood or body fluid. An applicator filled with 92 sponges, therefore, can absorb about 300 milliliters of fluid.

    The sponges cannot be absorbed by the body and all sponges must be removed from the body before a wound is closed. For ease of visualization and to confirm removal of every sponge, each sponge contains a marker visible via X-ray.

    "XSTAT is a novel device that can be rapidly deployed, providing fast-acting hemorrhage control to stabilize a wounded patient for transport," said Christy Foreman, director of the Office of Device Evaluation at the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health. "This will be an important new treatment option for our nation's military to treat injured soldiers who may not be in close proximity to a medical facility."

    The FDA reviewed XSTAT through its de novo classification process, a regulatory pathway for some novel, low- to moderate-risk medical devices that are first-of-a-kind.

    The FDA's review of the XSTAT submission included animal studies demonstrating its effectiveness at stopping bleeding and the absorption capacity of the device. In addition, non-clinical biocompatibility data and human factors testing were provided to demonstrate the safety and usability of the device.

    The XSTAT is manufactured by RevMedX, Inc., in Wilsonville, Ore.

    SOURCE:

    FDA
    Mick-Boy

    "Men who carry rifles for a living do not seek reward outside the guild. The most cherished gift...is a nod from his peers."


    nsrconsulting.net

  6. #6
    Plainsman
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    colorado springs
    Posts
    3,438

    Default

    Sweet any idea on when we can buy em?

  7. #7
    Paper Hunter
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    238

    Default

    This product doesn't make sense to me. I can only imagine how pissed a trauma surgeon is going to be when he has to pick out anywhere from 1 to 92 little pieces of gauze. I also don't know why you would unpack a wound in the field that is actively bleeding, pack the wound and apply pressure. If the pressure would harm anything, then that cavity is probably fill with blood anyway. I like an applicator for 1 gauze sponge that has clotting agents, but 92 pieces to fish out is going to suck.

  8. #8
    GLOCK HOOKER hurley842002's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    8,017

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flatline View Post
    I can only imagine how pissed a trauma surgeon is going to be when he has to pick out anywhere from 1 to 92 little pieces of gauze.
    I can only imagine that I don't really care how pissed a trauma surgeon gets, if those 92 little pieces of gauze save my ass.....

  9. #9
    Paper Hunter
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    238

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hurley842002 View Post
    I can only imagine that I don't really care how pissed a trauma surgeon gets, if those 92 little pieces of gauze save my ass.....
    Minor detail, this is considered an invasive procedure. Guess who approves the interventions performed by paramedics in the US. Guess who approves what the army medics carry and use. Spoiler, its a physician.

    Quote Originally Posted by KellyTTE View Post
    The concensus from the revmed guys is that it's easier to get the sponges out than to debride a bunch of quick clot powder or gauze out of a wpund.

    Galaxy Note II + Tapatalk 2
    You mean the guys selling the product say its better than the competitors product?!?

  10. #10
    GLOCK HOOKER hurley842002's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    8,017

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flatline View Post
    Minor detail, this is considered an invasive procedure. Guess who approves the interventions performed by paramedics in the US. Guess who approves what the army medics carry and use. Spoiler, its a physician.



    You mean the guys selling the product say its better than the competitors product?!?
    Kind of contradicting the physicians "frustrations" aren't you?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •