Your numbers look about right to me. Can't tell for sure without calipers or some sort of measuring.
Given that your horizontal extremes are also the vertical extremes it might be just slightly over. Even if your windage and elevation spreads are independently under 1 moa, the group may not be under one moa when measured correctly.
Measure center to center of the two furthest holes to confirm. Or outside to outside and subtract your caliber.
Last edited by J; 07-22-2014 at 21:12.
--J
My Feedback
"Praise be to our prophet, John Moses Browning, who hath bestowed upon us the new testament of shooting. Delivered unto us, his disciples, on 29 March 1911 A.D."
Close enough to MOA for government work.
If you can hold a ten inch pattern at 1000 yards that would be MOA as well.
Last edited by BPTactical; 07-23-2014 at 04:23.
The most important thing to be learned from those who demand "Equality For All" is that all are not equal...
Gun Control - seeking a Hardware solution for a Software problem...
Linear equation. But otherwise yes, what he said.
--J
My Feedback
"Praise be to our prophet, John Moses Browning, who hath bestowed upon us the new testament of shooting. Delivered unto us, his disciples, on 29 March 1911 A.D."
Effin Math up in here!
Just doing what I can to stay on this side of the dirt.
Assuming that the grid is 1 inch on a side, your group is a bit over 1 MOA. But not by much. That the group has more horizontal dispersion than vertical leads one to think that the rifle is more than capable of 1MOA given calm air and good hold. Usually ...
Sayonara
In Common Core this problem would be: "please write 2 paragraphs about why guns are bad, then draw a picture of a circle."
http://disciplejourney.com
“Make men large and strong and tyranny will bankrupt itself in making shackles for them.” – Rev. Henry Ward Beecher (1813-1887) US Abolitionist Preacher
CIPCIP