Close
Page 35 of 40 FirstFirst ... 253031323334353637383940 LastLast
Results 341 to 350 of 398

Thread: M855/ss109

  1. #341
    High Power Shooter
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    833

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HoneyBadger View Post
    Lol why is everyone panicking and paying so much for M855? Are you worried that you won't be able to shoot through walls? I'm sure any FMJ .223 bullet will do just fine... Still worried about not penetrating a barrier? Get a .30-06.
    People are worried they may not be all to shoot at all. The m855 ban is a test run. If they can remove a domestically produced round like m855 from the market, then they'll be emboldened to go after the rest under the same false "police safety" BS. Since they couldn't ban the guns they'll ban the ammo to feed them. They'll go after all the other calibers in time. Even .30-06 won't be safe. This isn't something to take lightly.

    This administration is going for all out gun control via ammo bans. Even if they can't get it all banned, how expensive do you think ammo is going to get when a good percentage of it is suddenly removed from the market? I'd be willing to bet m855 accounts for almost 50% of the .223/5.56 bulk ammo supply. Panic prices now may seem like a bargain in a few months. Pricing gun owners out of the market is as good as a ban. It worked for machine guns.
    Last edited by mutt; 03-04-2015 at 21:17.

  2. #342
    Machine Gunner JohnnyDrama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Cortez
    Posts
    1,280

    Default

    But this isn't about logic, science, truth, or even theory.. it's about politics and disarming people
    I don't even own a firearm chambered for 5.56 NATO. I write/e mail/fax my Congressmen because I don't want them coming after the cartridges I do have next.

  3. #343
    Gives a sh!t; pretends he doesn't HoneyBadger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    C-Springs again! :)
    Posts
    14,815
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mutt View Post
    People are worried they may not be all to shoot at all. The m855 ban is a test run. If they can remove a domestically produced round like m855 from the market, then they'll be emboldened to go after the rest under the same false "police safety" BS. Since they couldn't ban the guns they'll ban the ammo to feed them. They'll go after all the other calibers in time. Even .30-06 won't be safe. This isn't something to take lightly.

    This administration is going for all out gun control via ammo bans. Even if they can't get it all banned, how expensive do you think ammo is going to get when a good percentage of it is suddenly removed from the market? I'd be willing to bet m855 accounts for almost 50% of the .223/5.56 bulk ammo supply. Panic prices now may seem like a bargain in a few months. Pricing gun owners out of the market is as good as a ban. It worked for machine guns.
    Don't misunderstand me - I'm not saying that the legislation is good. It isn't. It is a very clear chipping away of liberty and I hate it.

    I just don't get why people are willing to pay significantly more for M855 than M193 now, or ever. By all means, stock up on whatever you need, but don't be wasteful about it with your limited resources (money).
    My Feedback

    "When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law." -Frederic Bastiat

    "I am a conservative. Quite possibly I am on the losing side; often I think so. Yet, out of a curious perversity I had rather lose with Socrates, let us say, than win with Lenin."
    ― Russell Kirk, Author of The Conservative Mind

  4. #344
    Hatchet Sushi Master Rooskibar03's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Vail, AZ
    Posts
    2,774

    Default

    Can't even get 55g at a decent price let alone if you can find in bulk. Bunch of horse crap, just want some ammo to play with my soon to be aquired can.
    Last edited by Rooskibar03; 03-04-2015 at 21:35.
    Progressive ideology, ideas so good they must be mandatory.
    Your freedom to be you includes my freedom to be free from you.

  5. #345
    High Power Shooter
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    833

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HoneyBadger View Post
    Don't misunderstand me - I'm not saying that the legislation is good. It isn't. It is a very clear chipping away of liberty and I hate it.

    I just don't get why people are willing to pay significantly more for M855 than M193 now, or ever. By all means, stock up on whatever you need, but don't be wasteful about it with your limited resources (money).
    I'm not saying you like the ruling (It's not really legislation. The ATF is making things up as they go.) but I think too many gun owners are taking this too lightly. Too many have the "What's the big deal?" attitude. It's a big deal.

    And people are paying significantly more for m193 as well. You can't buy ANY.223/5.56 bulk ammo at a decent price now. It's practically the same for 7.62x39. If you haven't stocked up already on your preferred flavor, you missed the boat and hopefully you can wait till the next lull (if there is one) in the storm to buy. Our side, as usual, is myopic and only focusing on the specific issue at hand and not seeing the big picture. This is about far more than m855.
    Last edited by mutt; 03-04-2015 at 21:53.

  6. #346
    Machine Gunner mtnrider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    1,240

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mutt View Post
    People are worried they may not be all to shoot at all. The m855 ban is a test run. If they can remove a domestically produced round like m855 from the market, then they'll be emboldened to go after the rest under the same false "police safety" BS. Since they couldn't ban the guns they'll ban the ammo to feed them. They'll go after all the other calibers in time. Even .30-06 won't be safe. This isn't something to take lightly.

    This administration is going for all out gun control via ammo bans. Even if they can't get it all banned, how expensive do you think ammo is going to get when a good percentage of it is suddenly removed from the market? I'd be willing to bet m855 accounts for almost 50% of the .223/5.56 bulk ammo supply. Panic prices now may seem like a bargain in a few months. Pricing gun owners out of the market is as good as a ban. It worked for machine guns.
    ^Winner winner, chicken dinner. This is just the beginning of things to come. M855 today, 193 tomorrow. Pretty soon you are only left with $3+ a round specialty hunting ammo (that is imposable to find). Pisses my off as I look around the web and see people comment "I don't shoot that anyway go ahead and ban it" They are missing the bigger picture,

  7. #347
    Gives a sh!t; pretends he doesn't HoneyBadger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    C-Springs again! :)
    Posts
    14,815
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mutt View Post
    (It's not really legislation. The ATF is making things up as they go.)
    I stand corrected. Very good point.

    Quote Originally Posted by mtnrider View Post
    ^Winner winner, chicken dinner. This is just the beginning of things to come. M855 today, 193 tomorrow. Pretty soon you are only left with $3+ a round specialty hunting ammo (that is imposable to find). Pisses my off as I look around the web and see people comment "I don't shoot that anyway go ahead and ban it" They are missing the bigger picture,
    Potentially true. That sort of outcome wouldn't surprise me at all. As to the folks who don't care... That just frustrating as all Hell.
    My Feedback

    "When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law." -Frederic Bastiat

    "I am a conservative. Quite possibly I am on the losing side; often I think so. Yet, out of a curious perversity I had rather lose with Socrates, let us say, than win with Lenin."
    ― Russell Kirk, Author of The Conservative Mind

  8. #348
    Machine Gunner Hound's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    1,764

    Default

    Funny you should say that. I met and talked with Rhonda Fields back in 2013 when the stupid laws were just starting to be put out. I really did not know who she was at the time. Her first question to me as a gun owner was "How can we get at the ammo?". I said "You can't". She did not like this answer. It struck me as odd since the laws were on BGC's and Magazines.

    Just saying....

    Quote Originally Posted by mutt View Post
    People are worried they may not be able to shoot at all. The m855 ban is a test run. If they can remove a domestically produced round like m855 from the market, then they'll be emboldened to go after the rest under the same false "police safety" BS. Since they couldn't ban the guns they'll ban the ammo to feed them. They'll go after all the other calibers in time. Even .30-06 won't be safe. This isn't something to take lightly.

    This administration is going for all out gun control via ammo bans. Even if they can't get it all banned, how expensive do you think ammo is going to get when a good percentage of it is suddenly removed from the market? I'd be willing to bet m855 accounts for almost 50% of the .223/5.56 bulk ammo supply. Panic prices now may seem like a bargain in a few months. Pricing gun owners out of the market is as good as a ban. It worked for machine guns.
    My life working is only preparation for my life as a hermit.

    Feedback https://www.ar-15.co/threads/99005-Hound

  9. #349
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    There is a difference between fighting the legislation and running out and panic buying the ammo though.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  10. #350
    High Power Shooter
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    833

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hound View Post
    Funny you should say that. I met and talked with Rhonda Fields back in 2013 when the stupid laws were just starting to be put out. I really did not know who she was at the time. Her first question to me as a gun owner was "How can we get at the ammo?". I said "You can't". She did not like this answer. It struck me as odd since the laws were on BGC's and Magazines.

    Just saying....
    Their side is unified with one goal - total disarmament. Nothing they say, do or inquire about is harmless or unrelated. Their only real division is how fast they want to achieve their goal and using how much force. Some want it it done over night with paramilitary thugs kicking in doors and dragging people into the streets. Others are content with a more "civilized" approach - the long game of death by 1000 cuts. The rest support something in between but the end goal is always the same. It's kinda impressive considering most of their foot soldiers, like Rhonda, don't have 2 functioning brain cells in their skulls. Their command structure is highly organized.

    Too bad we don't even really have a side. We're like a bunch of retards screaming past each other on the short bus. A bunch of self-interested sub-groups who really only care about their small part of the 2A and are all too willing to sacrifice the rest of it so they can keep their cherished part for just a little longer. Even our so called leadership is suspect. The likes of the NRA more often than not fails to inspire me. I have more than once wondered who's side they are really on.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •