Close
Results 1 to 10 of 398

Thread: M855/ss109

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    If I had a son he would look like....Ben SideShow Bob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    SE Aurora
    Posts
    7,121

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nynco View Post
    wouldn't that be moot... because then you are a manufacturer of banned items and just as guilty under some other twisted interpretation.
    So, would the mere possession of penetrator bullets (projectiles) and other reloading componants be considered "Constructive Intent" ?
    Should we start flooding the ATF with letters for clarification ?
    My T.P. wheeling and dealing feedback is here.

    Opinions are like assholes, everybody has one, and it stinks more than mine.


    Yo Homie, That my chainsaw ?



    Pati, improbe et vince

  2. #2
    Grand Master Know It All hatidua's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    boulder
    Posts
    4,099

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SideShow Bob View Post
    So, would the mere possession of penetrator bullets (projectiles) and other reloading componants be considered "Constructive Intent" ?
    Should we start flooding the ATF with letters for clarification ?
    it worked well with the Sig-Brace, I suspect it'd do wonders for most any other product Bloomberg opposes. If only he'd had his minions write continuous letters to the FDA about large soda's, maybe those could have been banned at a national level...

    Next maybe they'll deem M193 bad as it "goes too fast".

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •