M855/ss109

[68Charger]

I guess we'll never get to see the new 855A1 projectiles on the market. They seemed like they could be amusing as a sabot load for 308.

actually, the way the law works it applies to loaded ammo... you can buy all the AP projectiles you want, as long as someone puts them up for sale (price will certainly go up).
It's even legal to assemble them into ammo... just not legal to sell "AP ammo" to lowly civilians- you have to roll your own.

[nynco]

wouldn't that be moot... because then you are a manufacturer of banned items and just as guilty under some other twisted interpretation.

[KestrelBike]

keep reachin, batf. Can't wait.

[SideShow Bob]

wouldn't that be moot... because then you are a manufacturer of banned items and just as guilty under some other twisted interpretation.

So, would the mere possession of penetrator bullets (projectiles) and other reloading componants be considered "Constructive Intent" ?
Should we start flooding the ATF with letters for clarification ?

[hatidua]

So, would the mere possession of penetrator bullets (projectiles) and other reloading componants be considered "Constructive Intent" ?
Should we start flooding the ATF with letters for clarification ?

it worked well with the Sig-Brace, I suspect it'd do wonders for most any other product Bloomberg opposes. If only he'd had his minions write continuous letters to the FDA about large soda's, maybe those could have been banned at a national level...

Next maybe they'll deem M193 bad as it "goes too fast".

[Gman]

Thanks again for Obama, nynco.

Business must be slow convincing Democrats to leave their hands off of our freedom.

[Bailey Guns]

Thanks again for Obama, nynco.

He's not the only one.

[nynco]

Thanks again for Obama, nynco.

Business must be slow convincing Democrats to leave their hands off of our freedom.

I was one of the door knockers who volunteered many days for the recall Houdak campaign.... I did something to fight it and I no longer support Obama.

[68Charger]

wouldn't that be moot... because then you are a manufacturer of banned items and just as guilty under some other twisted interpretation.

You're only a manufacturer if you are building a product FOR SALE. That's where the alphabet gang gets their jurisdiction in this case- commerce clause. If you are assembling them for your own use, then you're not "manufacturing" (until they re-define that term, too).

[brutal]

Glad I stocked up on M855 last year.

That is all.