Reviews I've read so far that are coming from folks that call it the way it is, seems generally favorable to the Springfield Armory Standard model. They call out that SA uses MIM parts, receiver is cast vs hammer forged and that the build isn't completely milspec. Seems the comments were targeted more towards current production models with older M1A (80s) being milspec.
Need to decide how much of a difference that makes to me.
Colorado AR-15 Shooters Club Discussion Forums
Welcome to the Colorado AR-15 Shooters Club Discussion Forums.
Reply With Quote
