Close
Page 7 of 11 FirstFirst ... 234567891011 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 104
  1. #61
    BANNED....or not? Skip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Highlands Ranch, CO
    Posts
    3,871

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ridge View Post
    I'd been a fan of his using EOs to REMOVE EOs as they were an overreach of the Executive branch, but this is just the same thing.
    Judge just said Trump can't remove DACA. DACA was an Obama EO.

    Apparently EOs are now as binding as Constitutional amendments.
    Always eat the vegans first

  2. #62
    Grand Master Know It All crays's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Live-Aurora Work-Golden
    Posts
    4,265

    Default

    Dangerous precedent.

    Sent from somewhere
    Comply in public, Conduct in private.

    FEEDBACK

  3. #63
    CO-AR's Secret Jedi roberth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Elk City, Oklahoma
    Posts
    10,501

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crays View Post
    Dangerous precedent.

    Sent from somewhere
    Yes it is.

  4. #64
    Possesses Antidote for "Cool" Gman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Puyallup, WA
    Posts
    17,848

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Skip View Post
    Judge just said Trump can't remove DACA. DACA was an Obama EO.

    Apparently EOs are now as binding as Constitutional amendments.
    Yep. It's unconstitutional as hell, but SCOTUS wouldn't take it up. I'm very disappointed. I think Trump should 'resist' and keep pushing the issue. I'm tired of the selective enforcement of law.
    Last edited by Gman; 02-27-2018 at 11:19.
    Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
    -Me

    I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
    -Also Me


  5. #65
    .
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Florissant
    Posts
    4,380

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Skip View Post
    Judge just said Trump can't remove DACA. DACA was an Obama EO.

    Apparently EOs are now as binding as Constitutional amendments.
    I believe the "judgement" by SCOTUS was that the case would need to come up through the appeals court- not jump straight to the SCOTUS. Nothing has been ruled on yet.

  6. #66
    BANNED....or not? Skip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Highlands Ranch, CO
    Posts
    3,871

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gman View Post
    Yep. It's unconstitutional as hell, but SCOTUS wouldn't take it up. I'm very disappointed. I think Trump should 'resist' and keep pushing the issue. I'm tired of the selective enforcement of law.
    They didn't want to skip an appellate court, apparently.

    Which means that fighting an unConstitutional EO isn't as simple as going to court. You really need a lot $$$ to square off with taxpayer funded lawyers working for the gov (infinite resources).

    Not to sidetrack, but this is funny how the lies are told... Remember when the Feds told AZ immigration was a matter for FedGov? Now judges say the Feds can't enforce the law either. So we have laws that no one can enforce because Dims need to win elections.

    Lawless!
    Always eat the vegans first

  7. #67
    High Power Shooter SamuraiCO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Parker, CO
    Posts
    869

    Default

    The Dems will scream for a clean bill just like they did about DACA but when push comes to shove they will pull out because of what is asked in return. This is just the first salvo. Everything that is happening was foretold by history and our founders. Hence the reason the Constitution was written and set up.
    Armageddon was yesterday, today we have a real problem.

    Despite what your momma told you violence does solve problems-The Craft

  8. #68
    Zombie Slayer kidicarus13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Littleton
    Posts
    6,306
    Lessons cost money. Good ones cost lots. -Tony Beets

  9. #69
    Ammocurious Rucker61's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO, USA
    Posts
    3,359

    Default

    How do they even think this is a legal move?
    Te occidere possunt sed te edere non possunt nefas est

    Sane person with a better sight picture

  10. #70
    Bang Bang Ridge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cedar Park, TX
    Posts
    8,307

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rucker61 View Post
    How do they even think this is a legal move?
    Commerce Clause.

    But they can ban it just like they can ban drugs.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •