Developing. Apparently telling sessions he wants justice dept to draw up regulations.
Trump urges ban on 'bump stocks,' other gun modifiers http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...modifiers.html
Developing. Apparently telling sessions he wants justice dept to draw up regulations.
Trump urges ban on 'bump stocks,' other gun modifiers http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...modifiers.html
Progressive ideology, ideas so good they must be mandatory.
Your freedom to be you includes my freedom to be free from you.
And . . . here . . . we . . . go.
I always figured Trump would sell gun owners out on something (or a few things) as part of a grand bargain to get dems on board with something they didn't really like. Apparently, he's just going to hand them some gun control goodies on a silver platter for free.
merge it with this one
https://www.ar-15.co/threads/165185-...ump-stock-ban)
The Great Kazoo's Feedback
"when you're happy you enjoy the melody but, when you're broken you understand the lyrics".
I think this deserves a little more attention than it will get in Legislation and Politics, I think general discussion is a good place for it. The "modifier" part should bother all of us.
I wonder what the pressure on the White House was? If he just hands things over to the dems without a fight, then they will just go after something else on top of this. At least bargain with it (Not that it makes me happy at all).
I support impeachment now.
I learn something new every day. Apparently "bump stocks" turn regular semi automatic rifles into machine guns. It's sad that the generic public (sheeple) will not understand this and only hear the word "machine gun."
Thought I would add this post of mine from another thread:
https://www.ar-15.co/threads/167196-Boulder-AR-15-Ban
text bolded by meOriginally Posted by Originally Posted by from thedenverchannel article linked in Boulder AR-15 Ban thread
Is this a crafty Trump statement, or is this a caving? Because "devices that turn legal weapons into machine guns" are already regulated.
Hopefully, it's the former, and he's playing the dims for fools, and not a harbinger of policy shifts to come.
Last edited by crays; 02-21-2018 at 11:35.