Welcome to the Colorado AR-15 Shooters Club Discussion Forums.
I support getting rid of NICS and a checks all together. They have not stopped, nor will ever stop a criminal from obtaining a gun.
Silly we need permission to exercise a right.
I was in complete shock when I got the email last week and couldn't believe it. Researched it today and found out so I will have nothing to do with Daniels Defense.
Well that was fast. I doubt it will turn public opinion around.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Have always been a fan of the man and his products, have given him a lot of my money.Originally Posted by hatidua
Rock on Mr. Geissele
The vid gave me a little chill.
Last edited by motoboy; 03-12-2018 at 22:15.
So help me understand the reasoning for/against the Fix NCIS.
As I see it if you are a 2a person against it generally that is because you don’t think a check system is valid or useful?
If you are a gun grabber against it it is because it fails to reduce gun availability and gives cover to the right that they did something?
If you are a 2a supporter who supports it generally it is because you want to hold accountable the institutions responsible for reporting? You generally are ok with a background check idea or accept that it will not go away.
If a gun grabber you think background check will stop bad guys and this is a first step, then close down private transfers...
What am I missing if anything?
Awesome video. No wonder I spend my money they, completely justified now.
If you are a 2A supporter you know that ALL infringements aka impediments by the State to prohibit, or restrict the private citizens ability to obtain weapons on par with what a current U.S. Military Infantry or Special Operations Squad/Platoon/Company is issued is unconstitutional and illegal by the wording found in the Second Amendment.
If you happen to like Firearms, Target Shooting/Reloading/Hunting/Competition /Collecting/are a Concealed Carry Permit Holder etc, and use the 2A to justify your habit/hobby, you typically could care less about the 2A actually being implemented as intended and are “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, and deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.” These folks are fine with the existence of any or all of the following:
The BATFE, the NFA, the GCA of 1968, 1986 FOPA with Hughes Amendment Attached, Gun Free Schools Act of 1990, were probably ok with the AWB of 1994, and currently support the impending legislation to Ban Inanimate Objects of 2018 because reasons.
They are Sunshine Patriots who think illogically that “As long as I follow the laws, and no laws keep me from engaging in my particular hobby/habit associated with Guns then the status quo is ok” They are fence sitters, Fudds, “The Average Gun Owner” and they are in most cases worse for the defense of the U.S. Constitution than the following;
Everyone else? They are either willfully ignorant and “just want to be safe” or “Do it for the Children”
*See the Ben Franklin Quote above*
Or, are calculating and patient enemies of liberty and freedom. True enemies of the people, traitors, conspirators, or enablers of the same.
Political Action Groups: Moms Demand Action, Every Town USA, ANTIFA etc.
The Media: CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, NBC, BBC, NYT, WAPO, the Denver Post etc.
Politicians: Bloomberg, Pelosi, Schumer, Feinstein, Ginsberg, Hickenlooper, DeGette, Bennet etc.
Neighbors and Family: The Subaru Driving Latte Sipping Boulderite, Your Aunt Beatrice in Long Island, The Guy at the gym who never re racks his weights, your Sister in Law Emily etc.
If only things were that simple.
They are. But I know people who can turn 2+2 into a complicated 6 hour legal dissertation on quantum physics.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Lol, we all hate that guy.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
