Close
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18
  1. #11
    Possesses Antidote for "Cool" Gman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Puyallup, WA
    Posts
    17,848

    Default

    Saddam funding terrorism against Israel was stabilizing the Middle East?
    Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
    -Me

    I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
    -Also Me


  2. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Northglenn, CO
    Posts
    947

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bailey Guns View Post
    Practically everyone believed Saddam had chemical weapons because he did. As Gman said, he used them on his own people and with all the fiddle-fuckin' around had plenty of time to move them or hide them. Bolton (and everyone else who believed Saddam had WMDs) believed the way he did because just about every US and foreign intelligence source out there was saying he did. He didn't just come up with that on his own.
    he had very small caches of chem. munitions scattered about Iraq but not large stockpiles as we thought.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  3. #13
    BANNED....or not? Skip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Highlands Ranch, CO
    Posts
    3,871

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gman View Post
    Saddam funding terrorism against Israel was stabilizing the Middle East?
    There are people who believe he was a Sunni barrier against Shia Iran.

    It has been interesting to see the flow of weapons to ISIS. They seem to have benefited from US support during Obama's secret wars while "FSA" and Iran. I'm not sure ISIS could have been a thing if Saddam still controlled western Iraq.
    Always eat the vegans first

  4. #14
    Splays for the Bidet CS1983's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    St. Augustine, FL
    Posts
    6,260

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gman View Post
    Saddam funding terrorism against Israel was stabilizing the Middle East?
    We give far more money to Palestine than Saddam ever gave. Do you honestly believe with the grift in the Middle East, especially amongst Arabs, that money actually goes to non-terrorists, so-called?

    In 2016 the US gave $368,429,712 to UNRWA, which all goes to the Palestinians.
    https://www.unrwa.org/sites/default/...es_overall.pdf

    If we want to talk about funding Palestinian terrorism against Israel, perhaps we should look in a mirror.
    Feedback

    It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. - The Cleveland Press, March 1, 1921, GK Chesterton

  5. #15
    CO-AR's Secret Jedi roberth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Elk City, Oklahoma
    Posts
    10,501

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CavSct1983 View Post
    We give far more money to Palestine than Saddam ever gave. Do you honestly believe with the grift in the Middle East, especially amongst Arabs, that money actually goes to non-terrorists, so-called?

    In 2016 the US gave $368,429,712 to UNRWA, which all goes to the Palestinians.
    https://www.unrwa.org/sites/default/...es_overall.pdf

    If we want to talk about funding Palestinian terrorism against Israel, perhaps we should look in a mirror.
    There ya have it. Thank you State Department ya bunch of musloid kissing morons. Hopefully President Trump will put an end to money for palestinians.

  6. #16
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    What do you guys think of the Saudi Prince that is reaching out to Israel in the face of further conflict with Iran?

    I don't know how related this is, and Middle East stuff is pretty low on my knowledge scale, but thought I'd ask and see what people in here thought about that recent development.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  7. #17
    Splays for the Bidet CS1983's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    St. Augustine, FL
    Posts
    6,260

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irving View Post
    What do you guys think of the Saudi Prince that is reaching out to Israel in the face of further conflict with Iran?

    I don't know how related this is, and Middle East stuff is pretty low on my knowledge scale, but thought I'd ask and see what people in here thought about that recent development.
    More likely a move against Hezbollah, which is an Iranian proxy, than Iran per se. If a 2 state solution were to be worked, Iran would be marginalized because it takes away a lot of their anti-Israel clout in the region. The Shia and Sunni issue gets obfuscated on national lines, but it's not a national issue. The very idea of nation states in the region, at least in a modern sense, is a post-British colonial accretion. All those countries' modern borders are fabricated. Previously, they cordoned off based on tribal and cultural affinity. The so-called royal house of Saud is a sham. Ibn Saud was nothing more than a local warlord who played nice with the Brits.
    Feedback

    It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. - The Cleveland Press, March 1, 1921, GK Chesterton

  8. #18
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Thanks.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •