If you plan on shooting 230 grain 30 cal then it’s time to pull your head out of forth point of contact and just build a 338 something
If you plan on shooting 230 grain 30 cal then it’s time to pull your head out of forth point of contact and just build a 338 something
Tho it will make me a begger in the streets burn it if you must
John Adams to George Washington
One thing I never understood was building a WSM or SAUM and having to use a long action. Whats the point? I mean I get it and why but you just cancelled out the whole reasons of the benefits of that cartridge. I agree on the Norma, but barrel life is still a concern for me.
Why not build a .338 Win Mag that shoots the heavies that can mimic the lighter rounds of a .338 Lapua? I don't have the expense of a Lapua, a specific can for a Lapua, an action dedicated to a Lapua, but can mimic the ballistics. I agree the Lapua is a great round, I had one.
But you don't, you actualize the potential of the cartridge, which is greater than that of a win Mag or Rem Mag due to the efficiency of the case design (hence 180's at 3150 fps) that and not having to deal with belted brass.
Cramming the bullets into the case to fit in a short action is cutting it's nuts by a lot. Will it work, yes but it's not at it's best. .284 win is very similar, it works in a Short action but is at it's best in a long action. Also consider that the cartridges were designed around the lighter end of the weight for caliber bullets, which are a lot shorter and thereby don't suck up the case capacity like the big bullets do.