Close
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 31

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Varmiteer powerstroke79's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    593

    Default

    Take a look at The Thompson Center Compass. I bought one last year in 6.5 Creedmoor. After the the rebate ,shipping and fees it cost me $207. Great shooting rifle with some good features for $207. All the Factory ammo I have shot through it has been right around MOA. Hand loads are 1/2 moa.

  2. #2
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Longmont, CO
    Posts
    2,188

    Default

    Irv, I see where you are going with this.
    The rifle combo balances well. Thepredator barel is a bit heavier then stock (I think) but not bad overall. It should carry well. Kick is less than the 150gr out of a 30-06 and probably good enough for a kid that is 120lb. I'm about 2x that so the 30-06 didn't bother me much, but my kid started flinching after 10 rounds. That was the lightest ammo on hand and he wanted to try a bolt gun that day. He is strong but thin, can deadlift 1.5x bodyweight and do 15 pullups in a row, so careying it should be fine.

    Btw, a note on the Mod AR scope. With good light and properly focused, I was able to make out the holes ar 100yards on 9x. That is a huge step up for me from the bargain scopes I have been using.

  3. #3
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Well part of this is that I've got some lowers to build into another caliber. I had thought there was a 6.5 that could fit a standard AR lower, but it sounds like I was thinking of a different one. I'm less interested in switching to Creedmore since I've already got a .308, BUT I'm not so deep into .308 that switching would be at all difficult. As I get deeper into hunting though, I'd like a round that will be good enough for anything in the lower 48, which it sounds like 6.5 Creedmore probably would be.

    ETA: Kazoo, last time I checked, your job is to help people spend their money, not save it. Get back in your lane!
    Last edited by Irving; 10-22-2018 at 08:58.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  4. #4
    Rabid Anti-Dentite Hoser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    KCOS
    Posts
    9,222

    Default

    6.5 Grendel fits in a small frame AR. 6.5 Creed fits in an AR-10 lower.

    I wouldn't use a 6.5 Grendel on an Elk. Deer and Antelope for sure.
    You know I like my coffee sweet in the morning
    and I'm crazy about my tea at night

  5. #5
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Copy that. Grendel is the one I was thinking of for an AR. Doesn't make me any less interested in 6.5 Creedmore for a long range rig if I ever want to get into LD rifle comps.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  6. #6
    BIG PaPa ray1970's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Thornton
    Posts
    18,799
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Just tossing around more opinions.

    I put some rounds through my step dad?s 6.5 Creedmore and found it to be very soft shooting. His is a bolt action and to be fair I?m pretty sure it had some sort of muzzle break (brake?).

    My 6.5 Grendel on the AR platform seems to have a pretty decent kick, more so than his Creedmore. I am just running a flash hider on mine and it?s built to be short and light so that could be part of it.

    I guess my point is as far as caliber selection for youth or people who don?t enjoy lots of recoil it?s probably not as critical as the rifle platform and setup. If you don?t mind the excessive noise and a little concussion, I?ve shot magnum caliber hunting rifles that had breaks (brakes?) that had very little felt recoil and were a joy to shoot.

  7. #7
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Is it a shorter barrel that earns the compact designation?
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  8. #8
    Gong Shooter
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Littleton
    Posts
    317

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irving View Post
    Is it a shorter barrel that earns the compact designation?
    Shorter barrel and stock. LOP is 12.5?. I?m a big guy and mine looks like I?m carrying a 10/22 but it fits me just fine.

    I just checked Ruger?s website and it looks like they?re coming out with a Compact in 6.5 Creedmore. Sweet!!!!




    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  9. #9
    I am my own action figure
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Wheat Ridge
    Posts
    4,010
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    6.5 CM is a legit cartridge. Easy to shoot, load and does well on game further than most hunters will (or should) pull the trigger. It hangs (energy wise) with .308 and even some .30-06 loads. Our 6.5 CM 143ELDX has 1450 ft-lbs at 500 yards, our .30-06 180g has 1550 ft-lbs at the same range. That is not enough difference to matter. The .308 is around 1350 ft-lbs at 500 (I use 350 yards as a max for the .308 on Elk).

    RAPs are pretty good for the money. I have one in .243Win in a Boyd's 1AT stock.

    I tend to look at cartridges in clusters and most of the 6.5 to 8mm cartridges that push 100 to 200 grain bullets at 2500 to 3000 fps MV will be okay for CO big game, granted with different parameters. My max distance for big game is almost always based on sufficient energy to make a clean kill. Not a fan of 6mms for Elk, but use them a lot for Deer down to Prairie Dogs. I like to use .30 or .33 caliber on Elk, but am fine with the 6.5s and 7mms. My 14 year old is using a 6.5CM (Bergara) for Elk and he shoots it better at 14 than I shot anything at 21. My 16 year old uses a .30-06 for Elk. All three of us are using .243Win for Deer this year.

    Anecdotal, but I have seen more animals walk away, or not get collected, when shot with a 7mm Mag than any other caliber. Few would argue that the 7mm Mag is not sufficient for Elk. Some of that is just hunting. Practice with your kids makes more difference than adding 50 yards to their max range. All the people (including my Kids) I have taken hunting for the first time have to shoot 100 rounds in a variety of field positions at a variety of ranges over a few range sessions before hunting season. We then use that to lay down a Max distance, shot angles, etc based on their skills and caliber. Blake shot his first Elk at just under 350 yards and it was not a big deal at all. He was holding 8" groups as 550 yards with his hunting rifle and we set a limit at 350. But I have had some that 100 yards was their max, and they had to be sitting with the forearm on a pack. As their skills and/or size improves, they get more freedom in terms of their engagements on big game.
    Good Shooting, MarkCO

    www.CarbonArms.us
    www.crci.org

  10. #10
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I heard a former hunting guide talking about the early days of 7mm Mag and having lost the most animals with that caliber. They didn't really get into it, but it seemed like part of the problem was that people started hunting with it before there were good hunting rounds made.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •