Haven't seen them in person. They just came onto market. I have never been impressed with the optical quality for Sig stuff, however their laser has been pretty darn good.

At that price point there area few similar options. Sig, Nikon, Vortex, Bushnell, Rudolph. The main difference in these will be glass quality and laser. You may need to trade off glass versus ranging performance.

A lot of people seem to bag on the Bushnell because of the glass, I owned a pair of the older ones "1600 ARC". I used them for 3 years, gave them to my buddy and he still uses them. That is pretty darn impressive, not the best image, but very reliable and durable.

The Nikon and Vortex are basically the same. Laser and glass (distance and quality). Either of these would be a good choice to 1000y and not much more. I would probably go Vortex due to there warranty.

As for the Sig, I dont ever use integrated ballistics, and most people we should with dont either. We only use the to range finder, then reference the range with whatever ballistic calculator or chart we already have. I could see where it could work well with the BDX and Applied Ballistics, but it seems like everyone wants a tech solution for everything. I see it as cool-kid stuff and unneeded complexity.

I run the Rudolph Optics Bino/LRF. One of the forum members recommended these to me and let me play with his. He sold his Leica HD-B and kept the Rudolph's. We got a good deal on ours and they have been good and the company has stood behind them so far. The glass is pretty good (not Leica/Swaro) and the laser is fast. Good product at a good price. I have been running the 3 seasons.

If I had $2k laying around I would upgrade to the Leica HD-B, no question. The glass is excellent. We use our Binos all day and the glass is important. If you are hunting, good glass is even more important. As I have mentioned before, if Nikon put their new laser in their binos I would jump on those right away.