Close
Page 1 of 7 123456 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 66
  1. #1
    Paintball Shooter
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Ward below Brainard Lake
    Posts
    27

    Default Deer hunting with a .223

    In Texas we could hunt deer and hogs with the .223. As with every aspect of hunting it is up to the hunter to bring a strong sense of ethics with him/her and in once sense that could mean NOT taking a shot you think will cause needless suffering of the animal. In Colorado where I now live it is illegal to hunt deer and larger with a .223. Small game is fine. Having discussions with other hunters we all have reason to believe there was no factual data behind Colorado's decision to declare that the .223 was not powerful enough for white tail or mule deer. What I have never heard is that a .223 failed to bring down a deer. Does anyone know for a fact that deer are not killed by the .223 in 200 yards or less?

  2. #2
    Carries A Danged Big Stick buffalobo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Hoyt
    Posts
    15,792

    Default

    Why the need to hunt deer with .223?
    If you're unarmed, you are a victim


    Feedback

  3. #3
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    It all has to do with shot placement. Any caliber can fail to bring a deer down, at any range, with poor enough shot placement. I suspect you know all that. Wyoming recently made it legal to take big game with .223 and they might be a better example to refer to than Texas if you plan to approach a government entity about making a change.

  4. #4
    Carries A Danged Big Stick buffalobo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Hoyt
    Posts
    15,792

    Default

    I wouldn't use .223 for elk or bear and don't want to own hunting rifles in lots of calibers so .223 is not a viable big game round for me regardless of the reg.
    If you're unarmed, you are a victim


    Feedback

  5. #5
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by buffalobo View Post
    I wouldn't use .223 for elk or bear and don't want to own hunting rifles in lots of calibers so .223 is not a viable big game round for me regardless of the reg.
    Me either, but I'm not sure if I'd be against it. Would it bother you if the rule was changed?

    There are more hunting calibers than any of us care to own, so that's kind of a moot point I think. We have members that have taken elk with 7.62x39 and .300 blk just to say they've done it. Not much different I think.

  6. #6
    Possesses Antidote for "Cool" Gman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Puyallup, WA
    Posts
    17,848

    Default

    Deer in TX aren't that big. It's also possible to take deer with 22LR. The problem is "the public" and what's best for the management of the game population.

    If it were me and I was trying to stick to a NATO caliber, 7.62x51/.308 is my pick.
    Last edited by Gman; 12-19-2019 at 13:07.
    Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
    -Me

    I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
    -Also Me


  7. #7
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Texas is a bit of an anomaly because they have any animal you want to hunt, and I'm not sure that the state regulation addresses which calibers can be used on exotic species. Ungulates definitely get smaller as you go more south though.

  8. #8
    If I had a son he would look like....Ben SideShow Bob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    SE Aurora
    Posts
    7,120

    Default

    But... But... But... The crowd killing, ultimate assault gun AR-15 shoots such powerful round that it give PTSD to media types after firing just one self guided round. It is powerful enough to get a one shot kill on a blue whale even if it just nicks a dorsal fin . Maybe that is why some states outlaws the .223 round.
    Last edited by SideShow Bob; 12-19-2019 at 13:48.
    My T.P. wheeling and dealing feedback is here.

    Opinions are like assholes, everybody has one, and it stinks more than mine.


    Yo Homie, That my chainsaw ?



    Pati, improbe et vince

  9. #9
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    That is actually why Wyoming made it a legal round if I recall. The media was saying how ARs weren't sporting rifles, so Wyoming said, "Hold my 5-round mag" and made it a legal caliber for ungulates.

  10. #10
    BIG PaPa ray1970's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Thornton
    Posts
    18,799
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    If they allowed the 223 then next thing you know people would want to use the 5.56x45. That would just be too much for anyone to keep up with.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •