Close

View Poll Results: Calibers

Voters
76. You may not vote on this poll
  • .260 Remington

    0 0%
  • .270 Winchester

    5 6.58%
  • .280 Remington

    1 1.32%
  • .308 Winchester

    18 23.68%
  • .30-06 Springfield

    33 43.42%
  • .338-06

    1 1.32%
  • Other (please state in post)

    18 23.68%
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 44
  1. #31
    COAR SpecOps Team Leader theGinsue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Colo Spr
    Posts
    21,838
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Yeah, the last 2 posts are exactly the info I was looking for.

    Appreciate the info gents.
    Ginsue - Admin
    Proud Infidel Since 1965

    "You can't spell genius without Ginsue." -Ray1970, Apr 2020

    Ginsue's Feedback

  2. #32
    Iceman sniper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    16,986

    Default

    I have never hunted elk with a rifle. I use a .50 cal muzzleloader or a bow.

    for deer I use .243 as that is the only rifle caliber I have other than .223

    Some day I will have a nice 300 win mag. then when I get a deer it will be processed on the spot
    All I have in this world is my balls and my word and I don't break em for no one.

    My Feedback

  3. #33
    Paper Hunter TennVol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    East TN (for now)
    Posts
    297

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sniper7 View Post
    Some day I will have a nice 300 win mag. then when I get a deer it will be processed on the spot

    I am a firm believer in the theory there is no such thing as using too much gun for your quarry. Dead is dead. I want my deer/elk to drop where they are shot. I don't mind "losing" a bit of meat by erring on the side of a bigger caliber. I'm not a huge fan of tracking deer/elk for a long ways after they've been shot.

    As long as you can shoot your rifle accurately, use whatever caliber floats your boat. Just use one big enough to get the job done and put the round where it needs to go (shoulder, heart, lungs).

    Just my $.02 worth....

  4. #34
    Iceman sniper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    16,986

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TennVol View Post
    I am a firm believer in the theory there is no such thing as using too much gun for your quarry. Dead is dead. I want my deer/elk to drop where they are shot. I don't mind "losing" a bit of meat by erring on the side of a bigger caliber. I'm not a huge fan of tracking deer/elk for a long ways after they've been shot.

    As long as you can shoot your rifle accurately, use whatever caliber floats your boat. Just use one big enough to get the job done and put the round where it needs to go (shoulder, heart, lungs).

    Just my $.02 worth....

    I feel the same way, I like to be prepared and be able to shot very accurately, but there is a large difference between at the range and being in the woods getting ready to take an animal that is staring at you or pissed and your heart is racing!
    I have tracked an elk for about 3 hours after a .50 cal shot that went through both lungs...elk are amazing and have a huge sense of wanting to live...deer and antelope IMO are happy to die for the most part, but elk struggle to the very end.
    All I have in this world is my balls and my word and I don't break em for no one.

    My Feedback

  5. #35
    Guest
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Buffalo, WY
    Posts
    1,201

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sniper7 View Post

    Some day I will have a nice 300 win mag. then when I get a deer it will be processed on the spot
    Sniper, Tonight or tomorrow i'll find the picture of a buck I hit with mine at around 300 yds, it's pretty tore up. I was using 180gr accubonds.

  6. #36
    COAR SpecOps Team Leader theGinsue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Colo Spr
    Posts
    21,838
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TennVol View Post
    I'm not a huge fan of tracking deer/elk for a long ways after they've been shot.
    Oh yeah, tracking an injured animal has never been something I've particularly enjoyed. What makes it even worse is that they always seem to move FURTHER away from any roads or access points making your job of hauling the animal out even more difficult.


    Quote Originally Posted by sniper7 View Post
    I feel the same way, I like to be prepared and be able to shot very accurately, but there is a large difference between at the range and being in the woods getting ready to take an animal that is staring at you or pissed and your heart is racing!
    I have tracked an elk for about 3 hours after a .50 cal shot that went through both lungs...elk are amazing and have a huge sense of wanting to live...deer and antelope IMO are happy to die for the most part, but elk struggle to the very end.
    I've noticed this too. While antelope move quickly, they often stop a few hundred yards away just long enough to get a good shot off. The deer seem to practically beg you to shoot them and if you do, don't move to far before dropping.
    Ginsue - Admin
    Proud Infidel Since 1965

    "You can't spell genius without Ginsue." -Ray1970, Apr 2020

    Ginsue's Feedback

  7. #37
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    That's why you have your buddy circle the deer and you both shoot it at the same time while facing each other. Duh.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  8. #38
    Machine Gunner Colorado Osprey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Kinda near Peyton, CO
    Posts
    1,388

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cowboykjohnson View Post
    Sniper, Tonight or tomorrow i'll find the picture of a buck I hit with mine at around 300 yds, it's pretty tore up. I was using 180gr accubonds.
    People that don't belive that there is too much gun for deer and antelope need to go spend some time at a wild game processor. I can tell you that after spending a couple hours with my butcher this year the amount of waste from too big a gun and/or poor shots was phenominal. On average 30-40% of havested meat from deer and antelope was thrown out.

    Some animals the entire hind quarters were tossed. Others front half's were tossed.

    I have shot one deer many years ago under 100 yards with a 300 WinMag pushing a 190 grain bullet.
    The whole front half had to be thrown away.
    I will never do that again.
    Bullet entered the front shoulder exploding the shoulder sending schrapnel of bone and ribs through the ribs and removing the far shoulder.
    I say lets all remove the warning labels and let nature take its course.

  9. #39
    Guest
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    TN/ ex-CO
    Posts
    1,045

    Default

    What he^ said!

  10. #40
    Guest
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Buffalo, WY
    Posts
    1,201

    Default

    I shot towards the lungs behind the should knowing there would be damage. It tore up the ribs, but no major meat was lost.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •