Welcome to the Colorado AR-15 Shooters Club Discussion Forums.
Yeah the 40’s were from the CO Air Drop or whatever the initiative was called when magpul flooded the state before they said bye. It was great!
Please leave any relevant feedback here:
Sawin - Feedback thread.
There is no amount of email comments that will counter $oros money.
I am not smart enough to edit the "title"
I can understand why the Ruger mini-14 is not included in the ban.
I was watching a documentary about a crack commando unit that was sent to prison in 1972 by a military court for a crime they didn't commit.
These men promptly escaped from a maximum security stockade to the Los Angeles underground. Today, they are still wanted by the government.
Their weapon of choice is the mini-14. Thousands of rounds expelled, not one enemy casualty. They appear to be harmless.
If you spot these men, notify the authorities immediately. They are considered armed and dangerous.
Last edited by eddiememphis; 03-01-2025 at 19:38.
The A Team never gets old.Originally Posted by eddiememphis
I can understand why the Ruger mini-14 is not included in the ban.
I was watching a documentary about a crack commando unit that was sent to prison in 1972 by a military court for a crime they didn't commit.
These men promptly escaped from a maximum security stockade to the Los Angeles underground. Today, they are still wanted by the government.
Their weapon of choice is the mini-14. Thousands of rounds expelled, not one enemy casualty. They appear to be harmless.
If you spot these men, notify the authorities immediately. They are considered armed and dangerous.
Sterlings should also be exempted for the same reason
When will MP5s be eligible for C&R status?
I'll stop buying black rifles when my wife stops buying black shoes.
Here is the letter I sent. Feel free to copy it and sent it to all the assholes trying to shove this nonsense down our throats.
Governorpolis@state.co.us
Dear Governor Polis,
I am writing to express my strong opposition to HB25-003, a bill that I believe unfairly burdens law-abiding citizens while failing to effectively address violent crime. While I fully support efforts to enhance public safety, this legislation imposes restrictions that disproportionately impact responsible gun owners without targeting the root causes of criminal activity.
The vast majority of gun-related violence is committed by individuals who already disregard existing laws. HB25-003 places new legal and financial burdens on those who follow the rules, including extensive fees, waiting periods, and bureaucratic red tape that only hinder responsible ownership. Criminals, by their very nature, do not comply with such regulations, meaning the bill does little to deter those who pose an actual threat to public safety.
Furthermore, this legislation infringes upon the rights of law-abiding citizens to protect themselves and their families. Studies consistently show that restrictive gun laws do not correlate with reduced crime rates; rather, they penalize those who responsibly exercise their Second Amendment rights. Instead of creating obstacles for responsible citizens, our state should focus on enforcing existing laws, strengthening mental health resources, and targeting repeat offenders who drive violent crime rates.
I urge you to oppose HB25-003 and instead advocate for policies that address crime at its source rather than restricting the rights of those who abide by the law. Thank you for your time and attention to this important matter. I look forward to your response.
The bill was pulled from today's calendar. No word on when it will be heard.
No doubt rescheduled to 3:00 am on a Sunday morning.
The vagrants of Boulder welcome you...
Well written and saved for future use.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote