Close
Page 14 of 28 FirstFirst ... 491011121314151617181924 ... LastLast
Results 131 to 140 of 275
  1. #131
    Grand Master Know It All Sawin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    144th & I25
    Posts
    3,916

    Default

    Yeah the 40’s were from the CO Air Drop or whatever the initiative was called when magpul flooded the state before they said bye. It was great!
    Please leave any relevant feedback here:
    Sawin - Feedback thread.

  2. #132
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Colo Spgs
    Posts
    1,062

    Default

    There is no amount of email comments that will counter $oros money.
    I am not smart enough to edit the "title"

  3. #133
    Grand Master Know It All eddiememphis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    3,114

    Default

    I can understand why the Ruger mini-14 is not included in the ban.

    I was watching a documentary about a crack commando unit that was sent to prison in 1972 by a military court for a crime they didn't commit.

    These men promptly escaped from a maximum security stockade to the Los Angeles underground. Today, they are still wanted by the government.

    Their weapon of choice is the mini-14. Thousands of rounds expelled, not one enemy casualty. They appear to be harmless.

    If you spot these men, notify the authorities immediately. They are considered armed and dangerous.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Ateam.jpg 
Views:	309 
Size:	79.4 KB 
ID:	98393
    Last edited by eddiememphis; 03-01-2025 at 19:38.

  4. #134
    Machine Gunner JohnnyDrama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Cortez
    Posts
    1,275

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eddiememphis View Post
    I can understand why the Ruger mini-14 is not included in the ban.

    I was watching a documentary about a crack commando unit that was sent to prison in 1972 by a military court for a crime they didn't commit.

    These men promptly escaped from a maximum security stockade to the Los Angeles underground. Today, they are still wanted by the government.

    Their weapon of choice is the mini-14. Thousands of rounds expelled, not one enemy casualty. They appear to be harmless.

    If you spot these men, notify the authorities immediately. They are considered armed and dangerous.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Ateam.jpg 
Views:	309 
Size:	79.4 KB 
ID:	98393
    The A Team never gets old.

  5. #135
    Varmiteer
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Longmont
    Posts
    655

    Default

    Sterlings should also be exempted for the same reason

  6. #136
    High Power Shooter FromMyColdDeadHand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    806

    Default

    When will MP5s be eligible for C&R status?
    I'll stop buying black rifles when my wife stops buying black shoes.

  7. #137
    Grand Master Know It All eddiememphis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    3,114

    Default

    Here is the letter I sent. Feel free to copy it and sent it to all the assholes trying to shove this nonsense down our throats.

    Governorpolis@state.co.us

    Dear Governor Polis,

    I am writing to express my strong opposition to HB25-003, a bill that I believe unfairly burdens law-abiding citizens while failing to effectively address violent crime. While I fully support efforts to enhance public safety, this legislation imposes restrictions that disproportionately impact responsible gun owners without targeting the root causes of criminal activity.

    The vast majority of gun-related violence is committed by individuals who already disregard existing laws. HB25-003 places new legal and financial burdens on those who follow the rules, including extensive fees, waiting periods, and bureaucratic red tape that only hinder responsible ownership. Criminals, by their very nature, do not comply with such regulations, meaning the bill does little to deter those who pose an actual threat to public safety.

    Furthermore, this legislation infringes upon the rights of law-abiding citizens to protect themselves and their families. Studies consistently show that restrictive gun laws do not correlate with reduced crime rates; rather, they penalize those who responsibly exercise their Second Amendment rights. Instead of creating obstacles for responsible citizens, our state should focus on enforcing existing laws, strengthening mental health resources, and targeting repeat offenders who drive violent crime rates.

    I urge you to oppose HB25-003 and instead advocate for policies that address crime at its source rather than restricting the rights of those who abide by the law. Thank you for your time and attention to this important matter. I look forward to your response.

  8. #138
    Grand Master Know It All eddiememphis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    3,114

    Default

    The bill was pulled from today's calendar. No word on when it will be heard.

  9. #139
    Fancy & Customized User Title .455_Hunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Mountains West of Boulder
    Posts
    2,678

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eddiememphis View Post
    The bill was pulled from today's calendar. No word on when it will be heard.

    No doubt rescheduled to 3:00 am on a Sunday morning.
    The vagrants of Boulder welcome you...

  10. #140
    Gong Shooter
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Thornton
    Posts
    330

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eddiememphis View Post
    Here is the letter I sent. Feel free to copy it and sent it to all the assholes trying to shove this nonsense down our throats.

    Governorpolis@state.co.us

    Dear Governor Polis,

    I am writing to express my strong opposition to HB25-003, a bill that I believe unfairly burdens law-abiding citizens while failing to effectively address violent crime. While I fully support efforts to enhance public safety, this legislation imposes restrictions that disproportionately impact responsible gun owners without targeting the root causes of criminal activity.

    The vast majority of gun-related violence is committed by individuals who already disregard existing laws. HB25-003 places new legal and financial burdens on those who follow the rules, including extensive fees, waiting periods, and bureaucratic red tape that only hinder responsible ownership. Criminals, by their very nature, do not comply with such regulations, meaning the bill does little to deter those who pose an actual threat to public safety.

    Furthermore, this legislation infringes upon the rights of law-abiding citizens to protect themselves and their families. Studies consistently show that restrictive gun laws do not correlate with reduced crime rates; rather, they penalize those who responsibly exercise their Second Amendment rights. Instead of creating obstacles for responsible citizens, our state should focus on enforcing existing laws, strengthening mental health resources, and targeting repeat offenders who drive violent crime rates.

    I urge you to oppose HB25-003 and instead advocate for policies that address crime at its source rather than restricting the rights of those who abide by the law. Thank you for your time and attention to this important matter. I look forward to your response.
    Well written and saved for future use.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •