Quote Originally Posted by .455_Hunter View Post
I think that just changes the penalty for possession outside of the grandfathering. The grandfathering section is not being amended.
I agree with Hunter.
https://cbi.colorado.gov/sites/cbi/files/18-12-302.pdf

Effectively the change preserves an affirmative defense, but makes it a de-facto violation that can be challenged with the possession date. Honestly, not any different than how SBR's are in Colorado - even with a tax stamp, it's a de-facto violation, the tax stamp creates a rebuttable defense.

TLDR: Not that big of an impact to the existing magazine ban.

The training thing, as mentioned, is a huge f'n mess.

On the flip side, at least we don't have Dudley around, demanding that there be no training exemption at all. After all, we're still waiting for the benefits of his influence in 2013 to be realized...