Quote Originally Posted by Jer View Post
No, your point was based on how conservatives vote. My statement was pretty clearly that I'm not a conservative. However you want to label that.

We do agree on one point though... people not voting for a particular candidate can cause them & their party to lose. If the parties themselves understood this they would put forth better candidates to earn those "lost" votes.
When was the last time a 3rd party person came close to winning a percentage close to the Republicans or Democrats? Ross Perot?

That?s how Clinton was elected.

You can argue semantics, but generally you have the Republicans/ Conservatives or the Democrats/ Liberals to vote for who actually have a chance of winning the election.

I understand your point and it?s not necessarily wrong, but it?s idealistic. I?m a realist.

I remember in 2008 at the intersection of Wads & I-70 in Arvada there would be protesters every weekend protesting Bush and the Iraq war.

Obama won and no more protesters. Did the war stop? Did the bombs and killing of children stop? No. Their candidate was elected and that?s all that mattered. That?s the liberal hive mind at work. That is who we are up against.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk