
Originally Posted by
FoxtArt
It's pretty rare for the gov to come back and direct the killing of all survivors after all risks have been resolved.
Service members are often stationed in Leavenworth anytime they are caught engaging in similar activities in the Middle East. It's not something that has ever been formally accepted. Has it happened over there, and people are free today? Absolutely.
It's likely a challenge to find a drone strike, though, where they were ordered to fly back and blow up any wounded trying to crawl away, to literally "leave no survivors" because f*** them.
Is the level of attention justified? Who knows. But I do agree they need to sort out where that order came from. If it's Pete, his ass needs to be replaced. If a soldier got in trouble for this in the Middle East, then anyone directing it needs to be in the same trouble in this circumstance.