2026 Gun Grab..

[def90]

OK, any intel on what our state legislators will be passing this year? I've heard rumors of an NFA items ban..

[kidicarus13]

Hold on tight, it's about to get rocky!

https://youtu.be/A4oi9hHODBw?si=EFK3HyrCm1wH2DwG

[DDT951]

I am concerned about this “armory law” that is in the video.

How would this even be legal under the taking clauses for what already is owned by people?

[bellavite1]

They're doing it already with binary triggers, FRTs and bump stocks.
Yet I haven't heard a peep...
You may not care for them but it sets a precedent allowing the Dems to change the definition of "dangerous weapons".
Slippery slope.

[Oscar77]

I am concerned about this ?armory law? that is in the video.

How would this even be legal under the taking clauses for what already is owned by people?

Yes, that "Armory bill" cant be legal but that doesn't matter.
Its just another bill/law that we will have to fight and spend money on striking down.

[BPTactical]

I am concerned about this “armory law” that is in the video.

How would this even be legal under the taking clauses for what already is owned by people?

How about we be concerned with all of them?
They are all infringing on “Shall not be Infringed”

I’m really growing very weary of this shit.

[Clint45]

I am concerned about this “armory law” that is in the video.

How would this even be legal under the taking clauses for what already is owned by people?

Back during the Clinton administration, Joe Biden proposed an "armory law" before Congress I watched on CSPAN2. It was bizarre.

He insisted that a special federal "armory license" should be needed in order for a household (with multiple gun owners) to have more than 19 firearms or more than 999 rounds of ammunition. And he wanted to SPECIFICALLY ban commonly owned surplus olive drab metal ammunition cans because "scary lookin" or something.

Hardly a new concept, just on a back burner for decades.

Everything is a PSYOP, they just want to distract our attention from other things. It'll never pass.

[FoxtArt]

I wouldn't get too worked up on trying to predict what bills are introduced before they are introduced. If you were to do it, the most accurate prediction would be what was previously introduced but died in committee. Past failure predicts future reintroductions quite reliably.

The worst source of info to predict bill introduction is the clickbaity podcast or other randoms. Easy to say the sky is falling, much harder to have real information while doing so. Also easy to get worked up over shit that has 0% chance of passing in committee. Reserve energy and worry for actual risks, not hypothetical ones.