Monthly Meet?

[theGinsue]

Yes, yes they are

http://www.caivn.org/article/2010/03...cks-gun-debate

M2MG

I'd say they are more pro law than they are pro gun. I'm sure they'd rather NOT have people with guns in their place, but not if they have to come down on people's freedoms to get that.

Stuart, you beat me to the punch. As I was reading through the thread I was intending to respond that they are more "pro-Rights" and have taken the position that they don't want to get in the middle of this issue. Of course, it'll just take one moron to pull a stunt in a Starbucks (mass killing, etc.) to get them to change their stance.

Their position is surprising given their target demographic tends to be more of the tree hugging / kum-by-ah singing crowd (Not that they don't have plenty of folks like us that frequent the place).

[ChadAmberg]

Stuart, you beat me to the punch. As I was reading through the thread I was intending to respond that they are more "pro-Rights" and have taken the position that they don't want to get in the middle of this issue. Of course, it'll just take one moron to pull a stunt in a Starbucks (mass killing, etc.) to get them to change their stance.

Their position is surprising given their target demographic tends to be more of the tree hugging / kum-by-ah singing crowd (Not that they don't have plenty of folks like us that frequent the place).

We can always hope that this hypothetical situation goes the other way: that a CCW holder saves a bunch of people in a Starbucks from some crazed killer.

But I'm sure the Associated Press will still spin it with "Armed Veteran Kills Undocumented Cash Deposit Taker" or something.