Close
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    So nothing on this? Is it a total non-issue?
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  2. #2

    Default

    I don't have feelings one way or another about it
    _______________________________________________
    My Feedback
    http://www.ar-15.co/threads/27366-ghettodub




    Quote Originally Posted by Byte Stryke View Post
    Yeah, Leave it to our congress to be bipartisan when it comes to screwing the constitution.
    "Al Qaeda had better benefits than Wal-Mart. Although at Wal-Mart, you get to wear your vest more than once." -- Stephen Colbert

  3. #3
    Machine Gunner bellavite1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Wheatridge
    Posts
    1,949

    Default

    He should be tried and sentenced following the laws of the shit hole country he came from.
    FUCK OBAMA.

  4. #4
    Industry Partner BPTactical's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    North Metro
    Posts
    13,914

    Default

    It is total BS that a military combatant is allowed to be tried in a civilian court of law. Oboingo and his Administration knew damn well this type of ruling would be the norm for these cases.
    "Rendering aid and Comfort to the Enemy"
    I believe that this would fall under the above description.
    That is also one of the criteria for being tried for treason.


    Maybe we are trying the wrong people.....



    I could not agree with Bellavite 1 more on his closing statement.
    The most important thing to be learned from those who demand "Equality For All" is that all are not equal...

    Gun Control - seeking a Hardware solution for a Software problem...

  5. #5
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    SE Denver
    Posts
    2,197

    Default

    To me it says the justice system works...

    What do you think, the jurors were like, "Hey, all this evidence says he did it, but lets be funny and acquit him!"

    Obviously the evidence was not there. If anything, that one charge was "forced" upon him due to the high profile of the case.

    It still carries a minimum 20 years, possible life sentence.

  6. #6
    Fallen Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Smyrna, GA
    Posts
    6,748

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stuart View Post
    So nothing on this? Is it a total non-issue?
    not that its a non-issue
    nothing to debate.

  7. #7
    Gong Shooter OgenRwot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    123
    Posts
    474

    Default

    Should have never been tried in civilian court. There is nothing in our law or international law that even hints at the fact that he should have been tried in civil court. Captured on the battlefield during a battle in a foreign country and he's not a US Citizen not to mention he killed over 200 people. Military tribunal and hang his ass. But no, Obama, Holder and Co decide to "do the right thing" and he get conspiracy to destroy a building. WTF is that?

  8. #8
    CO-AR's Secret Jedi roberth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Elk City, Oklahoma
    Posts
    10,501

    Default

    He is a mass murderer and should be tried in a military tribunal and summarily executed immediately after sentencing.

    The current resident of the oval office thinks that fighting terrorism is some sort of police action or maybe less than that. The messiah and his staff are subverting military justice just like they inhibit military operations overseas.

    I would love to see Barack Hussien Obama and Eric Holder tried for aiding and abetting the enemy during time of war, then hang these sons-of-a-bitches high and in public, leave them hanging for few days. I am certain there are pigeons in DC that would love to shit on their heads.

  9. #9
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    SE Denver
    Posts
    2,197

    Default

    But how do you know he is?

    If the government said "that guy is bad and he's Muslim" you would believe it?

    Worked real well for Germany.

  10. #10
    CO-AR's Secret Jedi roberth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Elk City, Oklahoma
    Posts
    10,501

    Default

    The key sentence in the article

    Because of the unusual circumstances of Mr. Ghailani’s case, the prosecution faced significant legal hurdles even getting his case to trial. On the eve of the start of his trial in October, month, the government lost a key ruling that may have seriously damaged its chances of winning convictions. In the ruling, the judge, Lewis A. Kaplan of Federal District Court in Manhattan, barred prosecutors from using an important witness against Mr. Ghailani because the government had learned about the man through Mr. Ghailani’s interrogation while he was in C.I.A. custody, where his lawyers say he was tortured.
    The judge took the side of the defendant and that was the end of the case. IMO the judge was biased for the defense which is not surprising.

    In any case, Ghailani should not have been tried in civilian court.

    I would further argue that the result of this trial is exactly what obama/holder were looking for. obama/holder being typical liberals who carry the water for criminal rights and ignore the plight of the victims.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •