View Poll Results: which is better (see text)
- Voters
- 60. You may not vote on this poll
-
Well we one two wars with the 30/06. We didn't do as well after that. It is apparent that the 7.62 in the hands of a trained marksman is far superior to the 5.56. (Of course we don't seem to be teaching marksmanship like we used to either.) Sgt. York did real well with a bolt action 30/06. And the Garand was good enough for a truly global conflict.
During WWII we had most of our inventory eating 30/06. The Garand, the BAR, the .30 machine gun. And we taught marksmanship - one shot, one kill - to everyone. The 30/06 delivers that kind of power and accuracy. I doubt we'll see the /06 in the inventory again.
The 5.56 is a comprimise. It works okay, but the current trend in the military community seems to be leading back to the 7.62.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules