Close
Results 1 to 10 of 29

Thread: Archery Elk

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Gong Shooter King's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Frederick, CO
    Posts
    437

    Default

    100 Gr. 3 balde Muzzy's are what I shoot on my Easton ST epics. Im not a fan of mechanical BH's. I would rather tune my bow for a fixed BH and never have to worry about blade deployment. I tried out a mechanical f15 and it poked through my block target without deploying My muzzy's shoot just fine

  2. #2

    Default

    I was a huge bow hunter when I was stationed in MD. I still shoot now and then, but haven't hunted in years due to ....... Thunderheads and Muzzys, spin tune them and just kill shit. Leave the mechanical garbage on the hook in the store and walk away. I prefer the Muzzys with the carbons. Once it's spin tuned, you don't have to pull the shaft to replace the blades.
    Mom's comin' 'round to put it back the way it ought to be.

    Anyone that thinks war is good is ignorant. Anyone that thinks war isn't needed is stupid.

  3. #3
    Guest
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Conifer
    Posts
    902

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SA Friday View Post
    I was a huge bow hunter when I was stationed in MD. I still shoot now and then, but haven't hunted in years due to ....... Thunderheads and Muzzys, spin tune them and just kill shit. Leave the mechanical garbage on the hook in the store and walk away. I prefer the Muzzys with the carbons. Once it's spin tuned, you don't have to pull the shaft to replace the blades.
    Really? I've shot muzzy for years. Last year I swithed to mechanical with great results. My 150 class buck dropped in his tracks when hit and kicked a few times on the ground. Looked like he'd been rifle shot. I'm sure just lucky shot placement. But what are the downfalls of the mechanical? I use the o-ring retained ones. They seem to fly a bit straighter, and produce a larger cutting diameter. Do they fail often? Penetration seems to be no different, arrows pass clear through with no problem.

  4. #4
    Gong Shooter King's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Frederick, CO
    Posts
    437

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mx'r View Post
    Really? I've shot muzzy for years. Last year I swithed to mechanical with great results. My 150 class buck dropped in his tracks when hit and kicked a few times on the ground. Looked like he'd been rifle shot. I'm sure just lucky shot placement. But what are the downfalls of the mechanical? I use the o-ring retained ones. They seem to fly a bit straighter, and produce a larger cutting diameter. Do they fail often? Penetration seems to be no different, arrows pass clear through with no problem.
    Mechanical blades will fly straighter for most people. This is because a fixed blade needs to have a properly tuned bow to fly true. Most people just dont take the time to really tune their bows. The major disadvantage to mechs is the possibility of blades not deploying 100% of the time. Most people never have an issue, but look around on archerytalk and you will find more than a handful who have lost a kill due to blade deployment issues. I wouldnt say they fail often, but they can.

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mx'r View Post
    Really? I've shot muzzy for years. Last year I swithed to mechanical with great results. My 150 class buck dropped in his tracks when hit and kicked a few times on the ground. Looked like he'd been rifle shot. I'm sure just lucky shot placement. But what are the downfalls of the mechanical? I use the o-ring retained ones. They seem to fly a bit straighter, and produce a larger cutting diameter. Do they fail often? Penetration seems to be no different, arrows pass clear through with no problem.
    Angular hits can be problematical with the mechanicals, I've tracked one down that had this happen, it was an angular hit and was like the arrow hit and opened on arm and then just died after a couple of inches of penetration. Saw another one that hit shoulder blade on a deer and the blades never made it through the shoulder blade. When we picked up the arrow, it was obvious the arrow his solid and all three blades opened, but never made it in more than just past the broad head shaft. We lost that deer. It was shot from a Mathews at 280 FPS with a 395 gr arrow, plenty of energy, but the mechanical seemed to just suck up the energy when it hit the shoulder.

    I've seen the damage from them when they work, and they are definitely devastating. I've just never seen a Muzzy or NAP Thunderhead fail when it should have been effective. I just can't say that about the mechanical, and had multiple Muzzies through the front shoulders of a whitetail.

    A well spin tuned muzzy or NAP is going to fly just as straight as the mechanicals as long as you are not pushing them over aprox 280 fps. I've seen them get wind plane off of the blades at faster velocities. The NAPs seem to handle the 280+ velocities better than the Mozzy 3 blade heads. The 4 blade heads are better at the higher velocities out of the Muzzys.

    Spin tuning carbons is a serious PITA, but I learned to do a dozen at a time and the ones that I can't get to tune before the epoxy hardens become practice arrows. The rest stay set up for hunting. I make my own arrows, and the better the production process, the easier and better they tune.

    Yep, now I'm rambling...
    Mom's comin' 'round to put it back the way it ought to be.

    Anyone that thinks war is good is ignorant. Anyone that thinks war isn't needed is stupid.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •