Tracking of Firearms

[<MADDOG>]

"If they were his before the marriage, than they should still be his"

That's a fun part too. He'll have to prove he had them prior to their marriage. Explains the phrase "cheaper to keep her".

Oh, and he CANNOT sell any "assets" once paperwork is filed.

[Great-Kazoo]

sorry guys. the law and the courts are not man friendly. he will get screwed if he shows assets he sold to avoid paying her. anything that is not papered or has a paper trail should be hidden.
thats one of the main reasons (ALLEGEDLY) people buy guns from one another w/out paperwork. to avoid knowing who owns what.
if pressed he can say he knew the guns were a sore spot and by selling them (below market value due to the slow economy) he was hoping to smooth things out and get their marriage to work. THAT they like to hear !
he is not under oath. this is a divorce settlement not a trial.

if there is one person here who has told their spouse how much they paid for everything and where it is raise their hand :roll:
didn't think so...........

[<MADDOG>]

We are all shathouse lawyers! :P

The attorney will give the real response.

[WillysWagon]

Thanks for all the input guys, I'll let him know what you all said next time I see him. Bummer this happens isn't it?

Later,
Kyle

[Obiwan]

Can he "sell" them all to you for...say $1.00 each?

Then he could honestly say he sold them all

MAybe when he is back on his feet you might consider selling them back

[Gman]

And she'll say she sold everything she had, such as jewelry, and she's off the hook? No way.

[WillysWagon]

Can he "sell" them all to you for...say $1.00 each?

Then he could honestly say he sold them all

Maybe when he is back on his feet you might consider selling them back

Getting involved in his divorce is something i'm not going to do other than ask a question or 2 here on the board.

But a rifle for $1.00 does sound schweet :mrgreen: