Stage 1 280 ptsOriginally Posted by Tom Freeman
Stage 2 300 pts
Stage 3 160 pts
Stage 1 280 ptsOriginally Posted by Tom Freeman
Stage 2 300 pts
Stage 3 160 pts
That does sound right, now that you say it.Originally Posted by Zak Smith
It's in the rules:
Originally Posted by Eddie Rhodes
If steel is worth 10, then a miss is always double the value of the target. In comstock scoring anyway.
Makes a miss worth -20. Then, if you run out of time another -10 as added in for every target you dont shoot at, a FTE.
I dont like it, but hey its the rules. Back when I was the match director...
You know I like my coffee sweet in the morning
and I'm crazy about my tea at night
The only issue I see with the scoring is that we end up with a large number of people zeroing stages, which fails to differentiate between different levels of performance in those cases.
Im with you 100%. Maybe you could mention this to Rhodes. I dont think he cares to listen to my input anymore.Originally Posted by Zak Smith
Kinda like the AK match. Flash targts at 350 yards? He knew it was wrong and too hard, but did it anyway. Took a lot of the fun out of the match and made it last way too long.
You know I like my coffee sweet in the morning
and I'm crazy about my tea at night
I am planning to, but wanted to have an alternative proposal on the table.
The most simple change to comstock/ipsc scoring to fix this is to allow negative hit factors, and hence negative stage points. This is a trivial change for someone scoring with a spreadsheet, but an impossible change for people using the Windows scoring program.
It is possible to add "X" hits to all people on a stage, in order to push most people out of the "zero" range, but we also don't want to throw the stage points out of whack (because IPSC scoring weights stage points as they are added into match points).
IMGA scoring (which CMG uses) does not have this problem because it is impossible to zero using (fastest time / your time).
When is the next one?
See the Colorado Multigun link below: