Until the scientists can connect A and B by disambiguating the large chaotic system, the thesis that A causes B is not proven. The burden of proof is always on the one proposing the thesis-- that's how a robust epistemology (and rational debate) works.

Nothing subjective, nor is it "about me." That is simply the epistemology of the scientific method.

Politics has nothing to do with science and knowledge. Appealing to a political figure to determine truth is the logical fallacy of false authority. Calling us in denial is ad hominem, another logical fallacy.