Close
Page 6 of 9 FirstFirst 123456789 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 89
  1. #51
    Gives a sh!t; pretends he doesn't HoneyBadger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    C-Springs again! :)
    Posts
    14,803
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Okay fellas, I can understand wildlife officers needing ammo, even if they ARE getting 6 million rounds per person, but there is no excuse in the world for this: The Social Security Administration just purchased 174k .357 Sig JHP and it is to be distributed to Social Security offices around the country. Just read the first 4 paragraphs and ignore the rest of the hype.

    Call it tinfoily all you want, but can anyone come up with a good reason for the SSA to buy ammo? Even a single bullet?
    My Feedback

    "When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law." -Frederic Bastiat

    "I am a conservative. Quite possibly I am on the losing side; often I think so. Yet, out of a curious perversity I had rather lose with Socrates, let us say, than win with Lenin."
    ― Russell Kirk, Author of The Conservative Mind

  2. #52
    The "Godfather" of COAR Great-Kazoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Washboard Alley, AZ.
    Posts
    48,074

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HoneyBadger View Post
    Okay fellas, I can understand wildlife officers needing ammo, even if they ARE getting 6 million rounds per person, but there is no excuse in the world for this: The Social Security Administration just purchased 174k .357 Sig JHP and it is to be distributed to Social Security offices around the country. Just read the first 4 paragraphs and ignore the rest of the hype.

    Call it tinfoily all you want, but can anyone come up with a good reason for the SSA to buy ammo? Even a single bullet?
    That is weird seeing how the SSA office's here are manned by outside contract security, not SSA employees.
    In other news i'm off to my favorite NOCO reloading supply store, just browsing
    The Great Kazoo's Feedback

    "when you're happy you enjoy the melody but, when you're broken you understand the lyrics".

  3. #53
    Gives a sh!t; pretends he doesn't HoneyBadger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    C-Springs again! :)
    Posts
    14,803
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jim View Post
    That is weird seeing how the SSA office's here are manned by outside contract security, not SSA employees.
    My thought exactly. Is the SSA going to have its own security division or something? If they really are preparing for an uprising (as the tinfoily article suggests... lol) I think .357 Sig would not be their first choice. Strange choice of caliber, strange purchaser, lots of unknowns... Kind of makes me wonder which ammo manufacturer is in bed with the gov on this one.
    My Feedback

    "When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law." -Frederic Bastiat

    "I am a conservative. Quite possibly I am on the losing side; often I think so. Yet, out of a curious perversity I had rather lose with Socrates, let us say, than win with Lenin."
    ― Russell Kirk, Author of The Conservative Mind

  4. #54
    Guest
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utard
    Posts
    234

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HoneyBadger View Post
    Okay fellas, I can understand wildlife officers needing ammo, even if they ARE getting 6 million rounds per person, but there is no excuse in the world for this: The Social Security Administration just purchased 174k .357 Sig JHP and it is to be distributed to Social Security offices around the country. Just read the first 4 paragraphs and ignore the rest of the hype.

    Call it tinfoily all you want, but can anyone come up with a good reason for the SSA to buy ammo? Even a single bullet?

    Most Federal Agencies, including the social security administration, have Federal Officers/Agents to enforce the laws they regulate. Think about it, even the post office has its own police force.

  5. #55
    Guest
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Castle Rock
    Posts
    3,254

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anomad View Post
    Most Federal Agencies, including the social security administration, have Federal Officers/Agents to enforce the laws they regulate. Think about it, even the post office has its own police force.
    Yea, no need to worry people..... I am sure buys like these are common! Don't take the signs as any indication that something "might" be brewing. Don't even worry about it for one sec. With all those rounds you will be well protected when you go get your rations..........

  6. #56
    Guest
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utard
    Posts
    234

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jim View Post
    That is weird seeing how the SSA office's here are manned by outside contract security, not SSA employees.
    In other news i'm off to my favorite NOCO reloading supply store, just browsing
    Federal Officers don't do building security, its not their jurisdiction (sort of) and sometimes cheaper to contract out.

    All the building security at the Denver Federal Center and all the surrounding federal buildings is contracted out. If there is some kind of threat the FPS guys roll on it.

  7. #57
    Mr Yamaha brutal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Unincorporated Douglas County, CO
    Posts
    13,933

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HoneyBadger View Post
    Okay fellas, I can understand wildlife officers needing ammo, even if they ARE getting 6 million rounds per person, but there is no excuse in the world for this: The Social Security Administration just purchased 174k .357 Sig JHP and it is to be distributed to Social Security offices around the country. Just read the first 4 paragraphs and ignore the rest of the hype.

    Call it tinfoily all you want, but can anyone come up with a good reason for the SSA to buy ammo? Even a single bullet?
    Another future supply of cheap .357SIG! I hope they get Speer GDHP.

    My Feedback
    Credit TFOGGER : Liberals only want things to be "fair and just" if it benefits them.
    Credit Zundfolge: The left only supports two "rights"; Buggery and Infanticide.
    Credit roberth: List of things Government does best; 1. Steal your money 2. Steal your time 3. Waste the money they stole from you. 4. Waste your time making you ask permission for things you have a natural right to own. "Anyone that thinks the communists won't turn off your power for being on COAR15 is a fucking moron."

  8. #58
    a cool, fancy title hollohas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Littleton
    Posts
    6,070

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HoneyBadger View Post
    Call it tinfoily all you want, but can anyone come up with a good reason for the SSA to buy ammo? Even a single bullet?
    A lot of people ask the same thing about you and I.

    While it is concerning when obscure .gov agencies are stocking up because most of the reasons to do that domestically are scary ones...all I can say is make sure you have MORE than them.

  9. #59
    The "Godfather" of COAR Great-Kazoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Washboard Alley, AZ.
    Posts
    48,074

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brutal View Post
    Another future supply of cheap .357SIG! I hope they get Speer GDHP.

    Cheap talk. Go up against a few SRT agents and see if you still think the same way.
    I'm sure you're being sarcastic, but my sarcasm meter is on the blink.
    The Great Kazoo's Feedback

    "when you're happy you enjoy the melody but, when you're broken you understand the lyrics".

  10. #60
    Gives a sh!t; pretends he doesn't HoneyBadger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    C-Springs again! :)
    Posts
    14,803
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Alright, here's the skinny: (I think)

    This was really bothering me, so I started looking for some justification here. I spent about an hour searching the net until I found this. The link says that the SSA has an IG office with about 460 criminal investigators and auditors. IF these guys carry guns, the 174k rounds would afford them approximately 375 rounds per agent. No confirmation on whether or not they are armed, but if they are this sounds like a fairly routine and legitimate purchase.
    My Feedback

    "When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law." -Frederic Bastiat

    "I am a conservative. Quite possibly I am on the losing side; often I think so. Yet, out of a curious perversity I had rather lose with Socrates, let us say, than win with Lenin."
    ― Russell Kirk, Author of The Conservative Mind

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •