Close
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    BoulderLaw
    Guest

    Default Gun, Ammunition Tax Proposed to Fund Health Socialism

    Gun, Ammunition Tax Proposed to Fund Health Socialism

    by Ari Armstrong (http://freecolorado.com/)

    Part of a proposal for "universal," completely tax-funded medicine for
    Colorado describes "funding mechanisms" such as "taxes on weapons and
    ammunition to cover firearm-related injuries..."

    This "Colorado Health Services Program," selected by the "208" Commission
    for Healthcare Reform on May 18 as one of four for further evaluation, was
    submitted by "Health Care for All Colorado," a group drawing on the ideas
    of the Colorado Coalition for Single Payer, Boulder Health Policy Watch, a
    former Green candidate for governor, and others. The proposal can be
    accessed at http://tinyurl.com/2k2ykf.

    The proposal also discusses "Molding healthy behavior" for "Health habits,
    diet, child rearing techniques, etc." It calls for the creation of a new
    bureaucracy called "Colorado Health Services," described as "a single,
    comprehensive, publicly financed program designed for the integration of
    the financing, delivery, and administration of health care."

    On May 17, two Commission members praised this proposal for socialized
    medicine as "bold" and "refreshing."

    But there's nothing "refreshing" about discriminatory taxes applied to a
    Constitutionally protected right, nor, more broadly, about subjecting our
    lives to "comprehensive" bureaucratic control.

    With respect to firearms, many on the left routinely ignore the benefits
    of firearms ownership. Because responsible gun ownership enables better
    defense and deterrence against crime, discriminatory taxes on responsible
    gun owners would be particularly harmful. A high enough tax on guns and
    ammunition would constitute a de facto ban.

    Unintentional gun injuries are rare, and neither the general population
    nor responsible gun owners should be forced to pay for them. Nor should
    responsible gun owners be forced to pay extra for the mayhem of criminals
    and gangsters. Any such tax on responsible gun owners would violate their
    Constitutional rights, punish them for helping to reduce crime, and force
    them to pick up the tab for criminals and gangsters.

    The proposed tax on gun owners, and the proposal more generally, would
    punish the responsible and subject our liberties to the whims of
    bureaucrats.


    _______________________________________________
    Front Range Objectivism
    FRODO: FRODO@frontrangeobjectivism.com
    http://mail.frontrangeobjectivism.co...bjectivism.com

  2. #2

    Default

    The proposal also discusses "Molding healthy behavior" for "Health habits,
    diet, child rearing techniques, etc." It calls for the creation of a new
    bureaucracy called "Colorado Health Services," described as "a single,
    comprehensive, publicly financed program designed for the integration of
    the financing, delivery, and administration of health care."
    Besides the gun and ammo BS taxes, this part ticks me off too. I moved out of my mommie and daddy's house like 20 years ago. I don't need a new mommie or daddy sculpting my health habits.

Similar Threads

  1. Denver Bullets & Ammunition - Any Experience?
    By BadShot in forum Dealer and Range Reviews
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 06-13-2012, 21:22
  2. I'd like to more about corrosive ammunition
    By Dan I AM in forum Ammunition, Ballistics, and Reloading
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-17-2007, 22:59
  3. Ammunition Storage?
    By Delphi in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 06-29-2006, 21:37

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •