Close
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 23 of 23
  1. #21
    Just a little different buckshotbarlow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    littleton
    Posts
    1,866

    Default

    Ok, here's the deal on the xls...

    I started that sheet back in 2005 when I first got into reloading. Instead of having hundreds of different xls's for every gun and all the other bs, i lumped it into 1 xls file.

    So, I still have not found the magic formula for my savage 112 in 300wm. These are not accuracy loads for any given rifle, just different velocities out of the different guns. I'll post more when i recharge my battery...

    Quote Originally Posted by SA Friday View Post
    Just an FYI, but all of the sheets on that Excel spreadsheet were attached also. I'm not sure if you meant to do that or not.

    On the rifle loads, are those loads you concluded were accurate out of the respective rifles? If so, what size groups were you typically seeing with each? I'm interested because there is is an obvious velocity difference between the bullet types even with same weights. I find this interesting. I've always held the premise that every bullet/powder/rifle combos need to be treated as an individual set of conditions and have to be tested to find their optimum conditions. If the 300 WM data is all from the same gun, the velocity differences (and standard deviations) between the 180 gr bullets are interestingly spread apart.

    The 185 Berger (hunting bullet?) averaged 2891 fps and between the three powders has a standard deviation of 13.5.

    The 180 Nosler (Partition?) averaged 2950 fps and between the three powders a SD of 48.5.

    The 180 SGMK (Sierra Gameking?) averaged 2927 fps and SD of 38.6.

    Just based on the SD numbers, I would suspect you are seeing the best accuracy out of the Bergers and the least out of the Noslers. But neither the Nosler nor the SGMK are even close to the consistancy of the Bergers. Does this ring true?
    NRA BP+PPITH Instructor
    CO state senator: 2nd Amendment doesn't protect duck hunting, therefore:
    2 non web feet bad,
    2 web feet good...
    Vas-tly Different Now...and prefers corn to peas

  2. #22
    Iceman sniper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    16,986

    Default

    Well, I picked up the rifle today. Got some factory ammo for now so I will shoot that and get it sighted in and ready for hunting season. then I will figure out some loads to work up based on some of this data!
    thanks guys
    All I have in this world is my balls and my word and I don't break em for no one.

    My Feedback

  3. #23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by buckshotbarlow View Post
    Ok, here's the deal on the xls...

    I started that sheet back in 2005 when I first got into reloading. Instead of having hundreds of different xls's for every gun and all the other bs, i lumped it into 1 xls file.

    So, I still have not found the magic formula for my savage 112 in 300wm. These are not accuracy loads for any given rifle, just different velocities out of the different guns. I'll post more when i recharge my battery...
    It's all good. I like looking at stuff like the above. That's all. Since the data isn't what I suspected, the above isn't really going to show any trends.
    Mom's comin' 'round to put it back the way it ought to be.

    Anyone that thinks war is good is ignorant. Anyone that thinks war isn't needed is stupid.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •