So 2,000 grit is rough enough to start fresh on a non-convex blade? You don't need anything else to shape the blade initially?
So 2,000 grit is rough enough to start fresh on a non-convex blade? You don't need anything else to shape the blade initially?
"There are no finger prints under water."
Svord has videos of sandpaper use to convert a peasant knife to a convex edge. I start with 800 for a dull knife and take it up to 2000. 2000 gives a nice edge for the kitchen.
http://www.svord.com/pages/catalog/PKVIDEO.htm
Overall I prefer the results of a spyderco triangle sharpmaker to sandpaper/convex method. Touching up a convex edge with sandpaper in the field has obvious benefit in terms of portability, however...
Agreed- Irving- do this.
180grit is... Ambitious. I used a cheap foam nail file to shape my first time- guessing its 500grit? And then went to 1k then 2 then strop (cheap leather belt).
as for the spyderco set- I can't say, it looks nice... I've only ever used 1 stone and the convex method
Convex method does afford more strength to the edge than a straight chisel edge or a angled flat grind edge (for the same reason why rounded arches in structures are strongest) but the edge is not suited to all tasks
And Irving- I will bring the bk2 up to fridpa
"its like a f****** turkey shoot" -Travis Haley
For the convexing, I did this: http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php/863938
180 grit is waaaaay too aggressive for that kind of work.
Then I have sandpaper and an old foam mousepad. I set the sandpaper on the cloth side of the mousepad. 800 for restoring *destroyed* edges. 1000, then 2000 will put a very workable edge on.
Past that, a surplus leather sling with a little Flitz on it for self-gratification.
The back of a legal pad, and stropping on my own skin, past that.
9mm - because they don't make a 9.1mm