Do you really think people fall for the dishonest comments you make? You attacked the idea of using armed drones to aid the defenders of the consulate with the claim that it would start a war. That was you being the "arm chair quaterback". When I point out the silliness of the statement, you pretend you were talking about "boots on the ground". An equally silly statement since we had CIA "boots on the ground" already but an intentionally dishonest silly statement on your part.






Reply With Quote
