Close
Page 1 of 12 12345611 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 115
  1. #1
    Industry Partner cysoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Brighton, CO
    Posts
    1,049

    Default Do you oppose Senate Bill 13-195? If so, why?

    I understand the opposition to most of the Bills being debated in the Senate but there is one which I thought that people on both sides of the gun debate would embrace. This is Senate Bill 13-195 which would put an end to online training for concealed-carry permits.

    Over the years I have taken (and given) several CCW courses and, though I have learned a lot from every instructor, there are some courses that have focused a lot of attention on "the gun fight" but have completely ignored topics such as legal ramifications and Criminal/Civil Liabilities. Personally, I would like to see concealed-carry classes in Colorado standardized (like they are in states like Utah) where every instructor is teaching the same material and which requires the student to demonstrate not just proficiency in the use of a firearm, but also a course that thoroughly discuses topics such as situational awareness and conflict avoidance.

    Most of the on-line courses that I have seen are nothing more than a regurgitation of the NRA First Steps course which, at best, offers only basic marksmanship skill. The other great limitation that I see with on-line courses is that the student's questions can go unanswered.

    So, back on topic, do you oppose Senate Bill 13-195? If so, why?

  2. #2

    Default

    Not opposed to this having to be an in person course. However I don't believe it should be some long drawn out day long rigorous course. Far as I am concerned I have not seen anyone shooting up places with a CCW or being unsafe that makes me believe the current in person instruction is of concern. The process of going through the process at the sheriffs office can be hard enough for most people. Don't scare them away, we need more people out there with permits. Cover safety, law, rules of force etc and some range time would be great

  3. #3
    Self Conscious About His "LOAD" 00tec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Aggieland, TX
    Posts
    4,275

    Default

    No. Fuck that noise. Why do we continue compromising ourselves into further and further regulation? Leave the 2A alone.
    Last edited by 00tec; 03-09-2013 at 18:01.

  4. #4
    Machine Gunner Teufelhund's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Elizabeth
    Posts
    1,711

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cysoto View Post
    I understand the opposition to most of the Bills being debated in the Senate but there is one which I thought that people on both sides of the gun debate would embrace. This is Senate Bill 13-195 which would put an end to online training for concealed-carry permits.

    Over the years I have taken (and given) several CCW courses and, though I have learned a lot from every instructor, there are some courses that have focused a lot of attention on "the gun fight" but have completely ignored topics such as legal ramifications and Criminal/Civil Liabilities. Personally, I would like to see concealed-carry classes in Colorado standardized (like they are in states like Utah) where every instructor is teaching the same material and which requires the student to demonstrate not just proficiency in the use of a firearm, but also a course that thoroughly discuses topics such as situational awareness and conflict avoidance.

    Most of the on-line courses that I have seen are nothing more than a regurgitation of the NRA First Steps course which, at best, offers only basic marksmanship skill. The other great limitation that I see with on-line courses is that the student's questions can go unanswered.

    So, back on topic, do you oppose Senate Bill 13-195? If so, why?
    Tell me which of our other rights require a permission slip.
    "America is at that awkward stage: It's too late to work within the system, and too early to shoot the bastards."
    -Claire Wolfe

    "I got a shotgun, rifle, and a four-wheel drive, and a country boy can survive."
    -Hank Williams Jr.

    Feedback

  5. #5
    Industry Partner cysoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Brighton, CO
    Posts
    1,049

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teufelhund View Post
    Tell me which of our other rights require a permission slip.
    If I understand your questions correctly, you are implying that the Second Amendment guarantees the right of the individual to carry concealed weapons; is that right?

  6. #6
    GLOCK HOOKER hurley842002's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    8,017

    Default Re: Do you oppose Senate Bill 13-195? If so, why?

    I don't embrace any further Gov control on the right to defend myself and my family PERIOD!

  7. #7
    GLOCK HOOKER hurley842002's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    8,017

    Default Re: Do you oppose Senate Bill 13-195? If so, why?

    To further expand on my reply, if the "student" wishes to get the best instruction/experience possible, let it be their choice to seek out and obtain, not some government mandated "feel good" law.

  8. #8
    Machine Gunner merl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    longmont
    Posts
    1,802

    Default

    I support it for the reason of reciprocity. It could have waited until other states cut us off, then there would be alot more support for it.

  9. #9
    Grand Master Know It All newracer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Timnath
    Posts
    4,582

    Default

    I don't think you should have to have any training for a CHP, so yes I am against the bill.

  10. #10
    Amateur meat smoker blacklabel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Greeley
    Posts
    6,557

    Default Re: Do you oppose Senate Bill 13-195? If so, why?

    I don't believe that training to carry concealed should be required. It's not required to open carry.

    They're simply instituting hoops to jump so that we can exercise a right. This isn't a privilege and shouldn't come with stipulations.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •