Close
Results 1 to 10 of 52

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    High Power Shooter
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Thornton
    Posts
    773

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GilpinGuy View Post
    Fuckin government. God forbid we save ourselves.
    Yeah, part of it, or actually most of it, is because this is designed to go into the body. All the way from original QuickClot to Combat Gauze everything says "external use only". There is a distinction in the eyes of the FDA for something that goes in the body i.e. angiocaths for starting an IV or a monster one for a needle decompression. For invasive procedures they like a physician to have some oversight on that which is why Rx Only.

    All that being said the only any hemostatic works is by applying at the point of injury, the artery, IN the body. If Combat Gauze had been released in a different manner stating "apply to injured artery" it too may very well have had a Class II Rx Only designation.

  2. #2
    Ammosexual GilpinGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Rural Gilpin County
    Posts
    7,221

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cmailliard View Post
    Yeah, part of it, or actually most of it, is because this is designed to go into the body. All the way from original QuickClot to Combat Gauze everything says "external use only". There is a distinction in the eyes of the FDA for something that goes in the body i.e. angiocaths for starting an IV or a monster one for a needle decompression. For invasive procedures they like a physician to have some oversight on that which is why Rx Only.

    All that being said the only any hemostatic works is by applying at the point of injury, the artery, IN the body. If Combat Gauze had been released in a different manner stating "apply to injured artery" it too may very well have had a Class II Rx Only designation.
    Ok, fuck the FDA then. If I'm bleeding to death I really don't give shit what the FDA would like....I'd like to continue living my life without some beaurocrat deciding if I have the authority to treat myself or not. Or my wife or kids or some innocent victim I came across.

    I'm not bitching at you, just the insanity that is the government.

    Do they regulate dildos? They go in the body as well.

  3. #3
    Gives a sh!t; pretends he doesn't HoneyBadger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    C-Springs again! :)
    Posts
    14,816
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GilpinGuy View Post

    Do they regulate dildos? They go in the body as well.
    I would love to see a legal challenge along these grounds
    My Feedback

    "When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law." -Frederic Bastiat

    "I am a conservative. Quite possibly I am on the losing side; often I think so. Yet, out of a curious perversity I had rather lose with Socrates, let us say, than win with Lenin."
    ― Russell Kirk, Author of The Conservative Mind

  4. #4
    Burnin' It Down!
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Denver By the Creek
    Posts
    228
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Do they regulate dildos? They go in the body as well.[/QUOTE]


    LOL!!!! Apparently not, as I run into them daily in my travels,,,, wait, that might just be me in disquise!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •