I dunno. The language in the link Wolf posted seems pretty clear:
The air is generally a public highway and the airspace overhead is part of the public domain[ii]. But, if a landowner is to have full enjoyment of his/her land, s/he must have exclusive control of the immediate reaches of the enveloping atmosphere[iii]. Accordingly, a landowner is protected against intrusions in the airspace immediate and direct as to subtract from the owner?s full enjoyment of the property and to limit his/her exploitation of it.
I would think that a drone buzzing around in the airspace immediately over my property would certainly ?subtract from my full ownership of the property?. And if, as a landowner, if I am to ?have exclusive control of the immediate reaches of the enveloping atmosphere?, I think I would be within my rights to, say, water my air with a powerful hose, as I see fit. Not saying I?d have any right to preclude a drone from flying over anyone else?s property, but directly over mine, and low enough to be a nuisance? I?d try asking politely, but only once.
Would you use that same example to justify watering the street if you didn't like whom ever was in front of your house within 83' of your property line?