Close
Results 1 to 10 of 275

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Fancy & Customized User Title .455_Hunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Mountains West of Boulder
    Posts
    2,678

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brass View Post
    Page 18, section 8 eliminates the grandfathering of magazines:

    https://leg.colorado.gov/sites/defau...5a_003_eng.pdf
    I think that just changes the penalty for possession outside of the grandfathering. The grandfathering section is not being amended.
    The vagrants of Boulder welcome you...

  2. #2
    Keyboard Operation Specialist FoxtArt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Montrose
    Posts
    2,774

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by .455_Hunter View Post
    I think that just changes the penalty for possession outside of the grandfathering. The grandfathering section is not being amended.
    I agree with Hunter.
    https://cbi.colorado.gov/sites/cbi/files/18-12-302.pdf

    Effectively the change preserves an affirmative defense, but makes it a de-facto violation that can be challenged with the possession date. Honestly, not any different than how SBR's are in Colorado - even with a tax stamp, it's a de-facto violation, the tax stamp creates a rebuttable defense.

    TLDR: Not that big of an impact to the existing magazine ban.

    The training thing, as mentioned, is a huge f'n mess.

    On the flip side, at least we don't have Dudley around, demanding that there be no training exemption at all. After all, we're still waiting for the benefits of his influence in 2013 to be realized...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •