The post whore thread.

[buffalobo]

Ho-verines!

[BuffCyclist]

AW WTF!!!

Apparently incurred a $27 fee. WTF is that for?! They just automatically take 10% of my sale? Well thats BS! Meh, oh well. Guess I still came out ahead overall as selling the item for 80% of retail after incurred fees is still better than not having a buyer at 60% of retail price and having low balls offer 40% retail.

And I had it listed on armslist and a few other sites but again, only low balls.

eta: Would have been nice if they posted that in the "Fees" section BEFORE I listed the auction. It showed "Fees = $0.00". Not "Fees = $0.00 + 10% Final Sales Fee".

[TheBelly]

And what can I say, this is the first time I've sold on ebay in at least 4-5 years.

Yeah, I stick to forums or FTF. If its a new forum, I'll check the references.

[mcjhr]

AW WTF!!!

Apparently incurred a $27 fee. WTF is that for?! They just automatically take 10% of my sale? Well thats BS! Meh, oh well. Guess I still came out ahead overall as selling the item for 80% of retail after incurred fees is still better than not having a buyer at 60% of retail price and having low balls offer 40% retail.

And I had it listed on armslist and a few other sites but again, only low balls.

This. Again for me first and last. Too bad I have no more nice shit to sell.

[TheBelly]

Well, it's midnight:26 here. Later Ho Bags. Happy holidays, if that's your persuasion!

[bogie]

Yep, excellent..... That's a Leupold MK4 LR/T 3.5-10x40 in an LT-158 (SPR-S) mount.

pay attention to the amount of space between the objective bell and the rails. The cheek weld is pretty comfortable. I've had no issues with this optic height. The optic centerline is roughly 3" above the bore line. That's an important bit of information if you use a ballistic solver to figure out what the gun is going to do.

FWIW, I also use this mount for a Bushnell 4-24x50 scope, and there's sill enough room for a scope cover on that optic. Lets see if I can wrangle up a picture......

158 it is. It seems the centerline is actually 0.06" lower on the 158 than on the 104. My 104 fits perfectly against my cheek on another rifle.

that reminds me that I need lens caps. Also I'm going to sink another $450 in this gun by the time I get a trigger and free float the barrel. Damned expensive hobby!

nice looking rifles BTW belly.

[TheBelly]

158 it is. It seems the centerline is actually 0.06" lower on the 158 than on the 104. My 104 fits perfectly against my cheek on another rifle.

that reminds me that I need lens caps. Also I'm going to sink another $450 in this gun by the time I get a trigger and free float the barrel. Damned expensive hobby!

nice looking rifles BTW belly.

last summer was very expensive, as far as rifles are concerned. I started the gun obsession just wanting the carbine work to get better, then it grew into pistols and pistol competitions. Then the then-upcoming trip to the mountains prompted me into 'carbine-plus/SPR'type shooting, which led into an infatuation with longer range shooting, which is where I am today.

im certainly no expert, but I've sunk a couple of pennies into the shooting sports.

[TheBelly]

Oh, and if you're good enough that you can notice a ​0.06"​ changes optic height, I think you're more discerning than me.

i just get down behind the gun and shoot.

[TheBelly]

Yup, I can't sleep.

[bogie]

Yup, I can't sleep.

Bad dreams about bad teeth?