Do you oppose Senate Bill 13-195? If so, why?

[JM Ver. 2.0]

Your responses seem to cast things in a very narrow frame of reference. Ex. your explanation of a generational difference to explain the POV's different from your own seems, well, a bit simplistic - IMO, of course.

As I read BG's response to your post, he was (I believe) merely carrying your argument to a further point in your own logic path. For there to be a mandate for universal gun training, there would need to be universal acceptance of gun exposure. i.e. using cstone's procreation reference - the very reason there is now a universal mandate for sex education (under the euphemism of 'health' education) is due to the universal acceptance that our youth are going to be exposed to sex. Your argument follows that example as a direct parallel - EXCEPT - there is no universal acceptance of gun exposure. If there were such universal acceptance - then your suggestion of mandated training in school makes sense - as does BG's comment about M4 issuance.

Make sense now?

I would just like to say.... Teen pregnancy is a much bigger problem than gun control right now.... We need more sex ed in schools.

[DHC]

I would just like to say.... Teen pregnancy is a much bigger problem than gun control right now.... We need more sex ed in schools.

LOL. . .

A perfect example of thread drift.