Time to pay an anti CCW BIOCH back!!!!

[Mule]

Thanks for supporting this guy!

I was told by a guy on another board that his wife was published on that list.

Out of all of the boards I'm on, only UZItalk had deleted this post.
Where's Karl when you need him........
Greg

[MuzzleFlash]

Thanks for supporting this guy!

I was told by a guy on another board that his wife was published on that list.

Out of all of the boards I'm on, only UZItalk had deleted this post.
Where's Karl when you need him........
Greg

Hmm. http://www.uzitalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=27036 Mule, what handle do you use on UT? I searched the deleted post archive and found no posts by a registered member named Mule.

Karl, Let's not go there. As someone who actively supported you in your dispute with Jeff (more than you probably know), I can tell you that your characterization of Jeff as a "Nazi" is unfair and libelous. Jeff is principled and sets very high ethical standards for moderators. I know. When I became one, I had to agree to abide by them. On this, he does not bend.

Jeff no longer runs UziTalk. His business has taken off and he has very little free time to spend on it. Although he has spent considerable money running the board as it has grown to over 5000 members, he did not accept advertising. He has donated the board to another member who can afford the time and expense to run it and has stepped back to an ordinary member.

There were many of us that asked you to stay. You chose to leave which is your decision. In all my many interactions with Jeff, I have never heard him speak ill of you.

[Mule]

Sorry Karl, I thought you had an in over there. My mistake.

I'm mule over there too. I just checked my acct and it's still active. But, I haven't been in state much, so I don't get over there.

He deleted it within a few minutes of posting it. I talked to him about it too, but as you say, he won't bend.
Too bad. I disagree with choosing a "False" higher moral standing on an issue that has it's own standard. He fails to see the importance of something like this weighed against the alternative. Moral standards are great if there is a real reason for it. Posting someone's info on a board that is posting other people's information in a local newspaper is justifiable. She thinks it's going to make people stop getting CCW licenses, she found out what harassment was like and backed off. My understanding is the paper has changed it's policy now on doing this. If this campaign didn't happen, the policy would not have been changed. Somehow I think Jeff would sing a different tune if his wife was on that list and she was getting harassing phone calls, letters and people at his house. But, then again, he may be the type that hands over his weapons because someone told him it's the right thing to do. I'm a little tired of people not absolutely standing up for our gun rights and watching out for each other. The "it's not right" attitude is eroding our 2nd amendment rights.
nuff said....... Soap box is away now and I'll take a breath.
Greg

[MuzzleFlash]

I don't know why Jeff would care if someone linked to that VCDL site.

Anyhow back to the Bioch, I agree that she's got her just desserts for posting CHL owners' personal info. Now she knows what it's like having to look over her shoulder. There is absolutely no reason for a paper to print such info. I think they're hoping a permit holder's anti-gun friends and neighbors will read it and shun them like a sex offender. Funny, many of these same liberal papers editorialize against the state publishing the sex offender registries. Maybe some of their editors made the list.

[Mule]

Sorry I got so cranked up on that last post.
I hadn't read the links and was having fun with a week long migraine, talk about shooting off at the mouth.....
Greg